SBIR/STTR Research Award

RF Sputtering Coating of Electron Transparent Materials for Photocathode Encapsulation

Award identifier b7b2026a87a46b06d8f91ca40761ef4aa60b95a805501188a0bb03c0a862e781Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,684

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
EUCLID TECHLABS, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-02-18
Contract end date
2020-11-17
UEI
J7DNBL8YF4A2
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002145
Topic code
09b

Research abstract

Alkali antimonide photocathodes are commonly used in high-brightness photoinjectors because of their ultra- high quantum efficiency QE) and relatively low requirements for growth. The biggest challenge of using the photocathode is that it has an extremely stringent requirement on the vacuum environment and can be destroyed by even low doses of residual gases in the chamber. Consequently, the transport of alkali antimonide photocathodes is eminently difficult. Furthermore, the cathode lifetime is limited by the residual gas in the photoinjector. An efficient encapsulation is needed to avoid contamination during transportation of cathodes, preserve their QE, and increase their lifetime. Euclid Techlabs PI: Dr. Ao Liu) and BNL PI: Dr. Erdong Wang) together propose to develop a thin-film deposition on the alkali antimonide photocathodes as an encapsulation, via the well-established RF magnetron sputtering, with sputtering enhancement techniques. The proposed encapsulation studies include research on the sputtering configuration and recipe, sputtering enhancement schemes, tests of QE and cathode lifetime, and material characterization. A thin film coating is the only viable encapsulation method other than physical encapsulation using tube encapsulation via a base plate or a cartridge. In Phase I, we will start with building a new sputtering source with a vendor, e.g. KJ Lesker, taking into account overall geometry and the available port size and distance to the photocathode surface. We will modify the magnetron details to cater to the vacuum requirements of lower than 10-9 torr and high baking temperature. Customized targets such as a h-BN target will be acquired. The system will be tested at Euclid before being shipped to BNL for installation. Meanwhile, Euclid will test the sputtering enhancement methods proposed in the previous sections, using the existing RF sputtering chambers. The technique can be applied to most of the alkali antimonide photocathode growth chambers, considering the easiness to add a customized sputtering system in the multi-port chambers. Users will benefit from the encapsulated photocathodes and their unaltered QE. More robust cathodes with longer lifetime will become available for heavy-duty experiments.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

99 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $41,359,807. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.