SBIR/STTR Research Award

Sentient Science - A Multiscale Modeling Suite for Process and Microstructure Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing

Award identifier e767dfea953eecae435631754e5c8ff7101530290ec9599c70249ce415c8ab7dAwarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$749,602

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SENTIENT SCIENCE CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2020-01-10
Contract end date
2022-01-09
UEI
KELCA1NLRN88
Solicitation number
STTR_18_P2
Topic code
T12

Research abstract

In the Phase I period, Sentient upgraded its DigitalClone for Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology and successfully demonstrated and validated its ldquo;Process modelrdquo; and ldquo;Microstructure modelrdquo; for simulating metal AM processes. Sentient has partnered with University of Nebraska ndash; Lincoln for model validation.Specifically, Sentient has implemented a new ldquo;Process modelrdquo; to predict part-level residual stress and distortion for parts built using AM processes. The new model shows high simulation efficiency and accuracy. In addition, Sentient has improved the simulation speed of its ldquo;Microstructure modelrdquo; by 100% for predicting the grain structure and porosity.The proposed DigitalClone for Additive Manufacturing (DCAM) simulation suite will fill the technical gap NASA is currently facing, and meetnbsp;NASArsquo;s requirement very well. The proposed solution allows NASA to: 1) simulate the part-level distortion and residual stress with respect to various key process parameters; 2) simulate the microstructurenbsp;of as-built AM components with respect to key parameters and locations of interest; and 3) simulate the fatigue performance of as-built AM components at specific mechanical loading conditions. This physics-based simulation suite has been well demonstrated in different AM platforms (i.e. powder bed fusion and direct energy deposition) and several alloys systems that NASA is interested in. Those materials include Inconel 625, Inconel 718, 17-4 PH, 15-5 PH stainless steel, Ti64, and AlSi10Mg alloy. Additionally, the simulation suite can be applied to any new alloy with minimum calibration needed. This physics-based simulation suite directly benefits NASA via allowing computational testing for new component design, new materials, and new process, which will significantly reduce cost and time compared to conventional physical testing.In the Phase II effort, Sentient will focus on developingnbsp;of prototype softwarenbsp;and further validatingnbsp;different materials and components.nbsp;nbsp;

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

67 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2026). Reported award amounts total $24,470,838. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.