SBIR/STTR Research Award

Integrated Sensors for the Evaluation of Structural Integrity of Inflatable Habitats

Award identifier 4fcc4cc65f183fc3ad17ae8a64468b22a6bc8e7efb885b68cfb57d2c84636db2Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$749,615

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NANOSONIC INC.
Proposal award date
2019-12-20
Contract end date
2021-12-19
UEI
ZK7ECNMN7MM5
Solicitation number
STTR_19_P2S
Topic code
T12

Research abstract

The objective of the proposed NASA Sequential Phase II STTR program is to continue the development of mechanically flexible piezoresistive sensors for the measurement of long-term creep strain in inflatable habitat webbing.nbsp; During the Phase I and base Phase II programs, NanoSonic has worked with the Electronic Textiles Laboratory at Virginia Tech to demonstrate the technical feasibility of fabricating low modulus, high yield strain planar piezoresistive Metal Rubber sensors and using them to measure strain and creep in webbing materials.nbsp; During the Phase II-S program we will continue the development of these sensors, and, by extrusion processing, fabricate similar piezoresistive Metal Rubber and electrically conductive monofilament yarns that may be directly woven into webbings during their manufacturing.nbsp; Using a crosshead extrusion die, protective coatings will be fabricated on the yarns.nbsp; By varying the volume percentage of metal nanocluster materials during the extrusion process, conductive monofilament with defined internal lengths of piezoresistive sensor elements will be produced, allowing the measurement of local strain.nbsp; The extrusion of piezoresistive monofilament has been made possible by NanoSonicrsquo;s recent installation of a new twin-screw extruder manufacturing system.nbsp; Virginia Tech researchers will model sensor orientation in and on different webbing architectures, continue the development of custom Metal Rubber material connectors, and weave a large area test fabric incorporating embedded yarn and surface mounted planar sensors using its laboratory dobby loom.nbsp; Through a subcontract effort, Bally Ribbon Mills will directly weave conductive and piezoresistive monofilament sensor yarns into 1rdquo; Vectran webbing for testing.nbsp; Through a separate subcontract, ILC Dover will use a load frame in a temperature-stepped thermal chamber to perform simulated creep measurements using the 1rdquo; Vectran webbing and time-temperature superposition analysis.nbsp;

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

469 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2026). Reported award amounts total $155,330,549. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.