SBIR/STTR Research Award

Plasma-Enhancement of Absorbers for Improved Removal of PFOS and PFOA from Water

Award identifier b7c71d15a2b0465f18d43258145d8ccadd2415fb650fadf93732f01e747df1c2Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$399,977

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
AAPlasma LLC
Proposal award date
2019-11-01
Contract end date
2021-10-31
UEI
CJMLATF1JGF7
Solicitation number
68HE0D19
Topic code
18-NCER-P2

Research abstract

New regulations and advisory levels for perfluoroalkyl substances have resulted in increased drinking water treatment costs or abandonment of drinking water sources. Treatment technologies are needed that can achieve low parts-per-trillion levels. Presently, there are insufficient treatment technologies that can destructively remove perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and/or perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). AAPlasma is developing a novel 2-stage process using a non-thermal plasma treatment to regenerate activated carbon in the first stage, with an optional amination second stage that improves the activated carbon’s ability to remove contaminants from water. The system discussed throughout this proposal has been validated by a successful Phase I period of performance and offers water filtration technology that can be reused following plasma reactivation of the carbon and requires a relatively small amount of electricity to operate. Advantages of our system exist in significant reduction of capital/operational expenses and reduced environmental impact. AAPlasma, with the support of Drexel University’s Nyheim Plasma Institute, will use this SBIR funding opportunity to develop a demonstrative pilot-scale prototype of this technology and optimize it to remedy the shortcomings in existing water filtration technology in the removal of PFOA/PFOS from drinking water. Phase I efforts have already demonstrated a promising proof of concept system that yielded assuring results of industrial practicality. In Phase II of this SBIR project, AAPlasma will work with supporting industry partners to (1) define system specifications that satisfies the industry needs, (2) construct a pilot-scale prototype system, (3) optimize the pilot system to maximize commercial feasibility, and (4) field test the system at a carbon reactivation site with the support of Jacobi Carbons. Phase II of this SBIR project will conclude with the execution of the commercialization option period of performance, before collaborating with our industry partners on segueing into Phase III commercialization efforts supported by private investments.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2025). Reported award amounts total $7,188,460. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, Environmental Protection Agency, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.