SBIR/STTR Research Award

A New Sorbent Process for Transformational Carbon Capture Process

Award identifier de985e0d18821a5ad75ac79963beb61766d4c7b2ef70533468851f676aa58664Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2019-08-19
Contract end date
2021-08-18
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001976
Topic code
18d

Research abstract

The electricity produced from fossil fuels is essential to the world’s prosperity and security, but the increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations caused by the fossil fuel combustion are implicated in global warming.Although there are several methods for separating CO2 from the flue gases, all have significant drawbacks, including loss of efficiency and increased capital and operating costs that dramatically increase the cost of electricity.TDA Research, Inc.(TDA), in collaboration with Membrane Technology Research Corporation (MTR) proposes to develop high capacity, highly selective engineered polymer sorbent to selectively CO2 from the flue gases from coal-fired power plants.The new adsorbent will remove effectively CO2 achieving a very CO2 uptake capacity even at very low CO2 concentrations.The sorbent regeneration will be carried out by applying a mild vacuum, reducing energy consumption needed for the process.In Phase I we prepared various sorbent formulations and screened them to determine their capacity to adsorb CO2 under representative conditions.Based on the performance results, we carried out a preliminary design of our CO2 capture system, and estimated its size and cost.We also completed an engineering assessment to compare it to alternative processes.In Phase II we will continue to optimize the sorbent to enhance its CO2 capacity and scale-up the sorbent production.We will further improve its resistance to flue gas impurities such as moisture, SOX and NOX.We will assess the impact of critical process parameters at bench-scale and carry out at least 20,000 adsorption/ desorption cycles.We will then assess the performance of a 5 scfm unit in the field, using actual coal-derived flue gas.We will carry out the process simulation work and evaluate the techno-economic viability of the new CO2 capture technology to retrofit as an existing pulverized coal power plants.CO2 is a major greenhouse gas and the major source for anthropogenic CO2 emissions.It is the result of the combustion of fossil fuels, in particular the burning of coal to generate electricity.The proposed technology will provide a cost effective way to control CO2 emissions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.