SBIR/STTR Research Award

Additive Manufacturing of BWR Lower Tie Plates and other Fuel Assembly Components

Award identifier 78baf0481882e93893a7bc956c979defac977243a707287e7de1dce6dd8b7597Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,302

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2019-08-19
Contract end date
2021-08-18
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001976
Topic code
30g

Research abstract

Metallic 3D printing of nuclear fuel assembly components has the potential to remove unwanted cost, waste, and time from the fabrication process.In addition to the direct manufacturing benefits, design engineers can create fuel assembly components that increase the performance of nuclear fuel assemblies with features that were not manufacturable a few years ago.Because of the reduced build time, each new design can be quickly iterated, producing rapid transitions between prototypes and final designs.For these reasons, the Department of Energy is highly interested in advancing methods of manufacturing for nuclear energy technologies that allow for easier engineering and commercial production of nuclear fuel assembly components.Overall, Phase I and II are focusing on optimizing the lower portion of the fuel assembly by adding beneficial 3D printed features and combining components.Phase I successfully built two BWR lower tie plates with an integrated filter design and channel seal.These components were tested for pressure drop and debris filtering to determine which design had the best performance.Specifically addressing the lower tie plate of a BWR fuel assembly, 3D printing with Inconel-718 can enhance the debris filtering performance by constructing torturous flow passages that can be optimized for debris filtering efficiency and pressure drop.With the lower tie plate being 3D printed, channel seals can be added to the design, allowing for a reduction in part count and easier assembly.3D printing additional lower tie plates, analyzing specific features in different reactor environments, and performing full scale flow loop testing are the main goals of Phase II.The commercial benefits for 3D printing in the nuclear industry are innumerable.A 3D printed lower tie plate with channel seals and debris filtering features as one component can directly reduce cost by minimizing fuel assembly component failures and decreasing the number of components.In general, the benefits to commercial nuclear reactor operators and the public are the countless areas where this technology can be applied to make nuclear components more efficient and thereby reducing the cost of electricity generated by nuclear power.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.