SBIR/STTR Research Award

Superconducting Quarter-Wave Resonator for Quantum Information Systems

Award identifier 72339325efa76aa7bbf215fcd3b1b3d1b4e891ea0273bf5a156167919f8555e4Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,456

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM SYSTEMS, LLC
Proposal award date
2019-08-19
Contract end date
2021-08-18
UEI
GRKLZTXQZXE6
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001976
Topic code
29a

Research abstract

Computers based on quantum-mechanical phenomena, if realized, could disrupt many computationally intense fields of science, including high-energy physics.Complex physical problems require powerful machines consisting of many qubits arrayed in a high-speed network.High quality factor superconducting RF resonators coupled to Josephson junctions are one of the most promising solutions.Niobium resonators used in particle accelerators can reach Q-factors of the level of 1011.However, their designs were not optimized for hosting qubits.In response to this problem, RadiaBeam has designed an SRF cavity for quantum computers based on a quarter-wave resonator (QWR) with optimized shape, operating at the 6 GHz.A QWR is an attractive choice for the simplicity of its integration with the Josephson junction, which can be placed near the central conductor to allow higher coupling strength, and the feasibility of scaling it to multi-qubit system.In Phase I, we optimized the shape of the QWR and improved its geometric factor (proportional to Q-factor) by at least a factor of two.We designed and fabricated two resonators out of high purity niobium, with optimized and non-optimized shapes, and the test stand, including electrical and thermal couplers and magnetic shielding.The resonators were chemically etched at Argonne National Laboratory and delivered to the University of Chicago, where they were tested at 10 mK temperature and with single photon power levels.The Q-factor measured with several methods demonstrated clear advantage of the optimized shape.In Phase II of the project we will increase the absolute values of the Q-factor by improving magnetic and IR shielding, vacuum performance, surface finish, as well as by applying chemical and electrical polishing and baking.We will explore different materials and frequencies, and finally build and test the resonator with an integrated Josephson junction.The emerging discipline of quantum computing, although presently in its infancy, is rapidly growing and has an explosive commercial potential.Upon successful completion of the Phase II work, RadiaBeam would be in an excellent position to establish its presence as a supplier of components for this growing field by leveraging the SRF technology developed in this project.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

61 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2025). Reported award amounts total $34,857,770. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.