SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Cost 5V Spinel Cathode for Electric Vehicle Batteries with Enhanced Cycle Life

Award identifier 3295e9452c65d5c8bd5381ab791193758ba0200f17d3f1780e93e63144253228Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,845

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
CAMX Power LLC
Proposal award date
2019-08-19
Contract end date
2021-08-18
UEI
FJWJMA3XEHV9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001976
Topic code
13a

Research abstract

Broad commercialization and adoption of electric drive vehicles (EVs) that meet the market requirements for driving range necessitates development of electrochemical storage technologies that can deliver high energy density while providing requisite power, cycle life and calendar life at a low cost.Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are the current technology of choice for both consumer electronics and emerging EVs.However, the highest energy density Li-ion cells currently used for commercial portable power applications are still well over 100 $/kWh in cost.On a $/kWh basis, Li-ion costs are more greatly driven by cathode materials than by any other component, and therefore lower cost, high-performance next generation cathode materials are needed to provide higher energy density, lower cost Li-ion cells.CAMX Power is developing a novel low-cost, high voltage Li-ion cathode chemistry with long cycle life.This novel chemistry produced via a low-cost manufacturing process, enables Li-ion electric drive vehicle batteries that are lower cost and higher energy density.CAMX Power will resolve historical challenges of high voltage cathodes by developing an inexpensive manufacturing process, developing protective coatings based on ionically and electronically conducting materials to boost high temperature cycle life, and by developing electrolyte formulations that are stable for high voltage operation.In Phase I, we demonstrated a pathway for low-cost production of LNMO cathodes.We also explored different techniques for coating the material with protective layers and demonstrated electrochemical performance of coated materials relative to uncoated controls.Materials were evaluated with a range of different electrolytes and tested in small pouch cells opposite a graphite and LTO anodes for both room temperature and high temperature cycle life.CAMX Power low-cost, high voltage spinel cathode material technology will enable achievement of DOE’s energy and power goals for future EV batteries.Our high voltage cathode technology will enable use of fewer cells in EVs as well as circumvent the challenges associated with limitations in cobalt availability while achieving the lower costs that are required for widespread EV adoption.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

31 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2025). Reported award amounts total $22,162,119. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.