SBIR/STTR Research Award

Continuous-Fiber & Long-Fiber Thermoplastic Composite Molding for Aerospace Structures

Award identifier 6eea97b3b709b5e9a33de3705204cc7d6de427f80733727963d8d2d3a2e016d9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,105,467

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ARRIS COMPOSITES, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-09-23
Contract end date
2026-12-23
UEI
KWDMWD5L52B7
Solicitation number
X25.5
Topic code
AFX255-DPCSO6

Research abstract

Metallic brackets, clips, and struts inside USAF fighters, legacy UAS, and the emerging NGAD family-of-systems drive cost, lead-time, and weight while relying on titanium and aluminum supply chains anchored in China and Russia. ARRIS Composites proposes a Direct-to-Phase II effort that will redesign, manufacture, and test two existing high-impact metallic components—one titanium-based, one aluminum-based—using the company’s proven Additive Molding (continuous-fiber compression) and Cross-Scale (long-fiber injection) thermoplastic-composite molding processes. ARRIS' technologies are currently used in consumer and commercial parts, but adoption has not yet made it to the DAF.  Additive Molding robotically aligns continuous carbon fibers along topology-optimized load paths, then consolidates the preform in a matched-metal press, achieving titanium-level strength with up to 82% weight reduction and < 0.5 % porosity. Cross-Scale achieves 5–10 mm fiber length using standard injection molding hardware, delivering aluminum-level stiffness and strength at half the density and fast cycle times.   Phase II plan:Partner with DAF to down-select two metallic fighter/UAS parts suffering from weight or supply-chain pain points. Re-engineer each part in CFRTP (carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites), targeting >40 % mass drop while meeting or exceeding performance requirements. Manufacture proof-of-concept parts to validate design and manufacturing tooling. Set up a production cell to support production-level requirements for each part documenting detailed setup and throughput metrics. Manufacture production-level parts Validate part performance through static, fatigue, vibration, and thermal testing in accordance with MIL-STD-810, and delivering prototype parts along with fully costed Bill of Materials  Commercial feasibility and risk mitigation are robustly demonstrated: Arris’ processes already produce > 1 million consumer parts per year—e.g., carbon spokes launched with Specialized and high-load rocker brackets for Trek—demonstrating TRL 7-9 manufacturing maturity. Arris currently operates qualified composite production lines for global OEMs and three leading defense primes have provided Letters of Intent supporting the transition to Phase III and beyond.  By fusing consumer-grade throughput with aerospace-grade performance and traceability, this project will offer the Air Force a U.S.-based solution for lightweight, cost-effective, and sustainable aircraft structures for both legacy-platform sustainment and next generation aircraft and UAS.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.