SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Approach for Characterizing Exposure and Response to Engineered Nanomaterials in the Gut

Award identifier 5c503392483e7b358a63d8b896058aa2772e77e155b69ee8ecb34944ec324200Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$225,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Mattek Corporation
Proposal award date
2019-04-17
Contract end date
2020-09-30
UEI
Q1V1JV6GJW77
Solicitation number
ES18-008
Topic code
NIEHS

Research abstract

Consumer safety concerns are mounting as engineered nanoparticlesENPsare increasingly being incorporated into consumable productssuch as fooddrugsand personal care productsWhile toxicological effects of inhaled and skin contacting ENPs have been evaluatedvery little is known about the short term and long term effects of ingested ENPsTo evaluate the safety and possible toxic effects of ENPs on the gastrointestinalGIepitheliumhuman primary cell based screening assays are urgently neededSpecificallyusing more compleximmunocompetent in vitro systems that mimic the native tissue microenvironment would greatly advance our ability to accurately assess the intestinal toxicity of ingested ENPsThe overall objective of this proposal is to develop an in vitro test methodology that accurately determines the toxicological profile of ENPs following intestinal exposureTo achieve this goalwe will utilize MatTek Corporation s highly differentiatedorganotypic EpiIntestinal tissue model containing epithelial cellsfibroblastsand immune cellsDuring Phasea prediction model will be developed to identify ENPs that are likely to cause gastrointestinalGIirritationinflammation or genotoxicityor perturb homeostasisbarrier functionin the GI tractSince repeat exposure to ENPs is implicated in nanotoxicityboth acute and chronic exposure conditions will be simulatedSuch a human cell basedin vitro GI toxicity model which recapitulates the human small intestine will have enormous market utility for screening ingestible nanomaterials used in the pharmaceutical and food industries Adverse effects in the gastrointestinal tract are major concerns for engineered nanoparticlesENPsincorporated into foodsdrugs and consumer care productsThis project will develop an in vitro small intestine tissue based assay method to identify biomarkers that can better predict the effects of ENPs on the human gastrointestinal tractThe multicellular nature of the reconstructed tissue model allows investigation of cellularmolecularand immunological mechanisms of gastrointestinal related adverse effectsWe anticipate that this project will allow us to develop a highly sensitive and reliable set of biomarkers to screen ENPs intended for oral administration

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

57 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2020). Reported award amounts total $21,284,028. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.