SBIR/STTR Research Award

Laser Microfabrication Of THz Wakefield Structures

Award identifier 2afd28d5b3f8eb6efd0f259121bbf914c826518b83b511836ab60202b6508bfeAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,573

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
EUCLID TECHLABS, LLC
Proposal award date
2019-02-19
Contract end date
2019-11-18
UEI
J7DNBL8YF4A2
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001940
Topic code
08a

Research abstract

X-Ray free electron lasers are unique tools for investigating nanoscale structure and dynamics. These are large facilities because they require electrons to be accelerated to few GeV energies. To make them compact, an acceleration at high gradient and high frequency is proposed. However at this moment, there is no reliable fabrication method for high frequency corrugated accelerating structures. The corrugations required are on the order of 50–150 micron depth and 150–300 micron periodicity. This is combined with 2-mm inner diameter, 50-cm length and 10-micron straightness requirement. Euclid Techlabs LLC proposes a highly serial method of structure fabrication: laser ablation. The waveguide will be produced in a split block: two copper plates with corrugated half-channel ablated in them will be joined together to form the required corrugated waveguide. A combination of laser beam rastering, stage translation and inline metrology allows for precise fabrication of long corrugated waveguides. In recent years, laser micromachining has made impressive improvements in terms of accuracy, scalability and surface finish. Furthermore, the availability of femtosecond lasers yields ablation without melting. Surfaces processed in this fashion exhibit less structural damage and are expected to have a high damage threshold. In Phase I, we will produce several waveguide prototypes. We will perform extensive metrology measurements to identify and mitigate the main factors that adversely influence manufacturing tolerances. The ultimate goal of Phase I is to produce a 5-cm waveguide prototype with the required straightness and features. The goal of the project as a whole is to produce and test the full-featured, 50-cm-long corrugated waveguide. The proposed approach allows the fabrication of intricate corrugated structures for microwave components in the mm and sub-mm range. Currently such structures are fabricated in multiple steps based on semiconductor technologies that include lithography, etching and sputtering. This process is expensive and structures are limited in their size and breakdown strength. Laser microfabrication paired with online metrology is an inexpensive alternative, a perfect approach for rapid prototyping of high power THz structures for vacuum electronics and wakefield acceleration.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

99 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $41,359,807. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.