SBIR/STTR Research Award

Inexpensive, Minimally Invasive Fluorescent Imaging of the X-Ray Beam with Simultaneous Flux Measurement

Award identifier 0ab1f3e0ddb648532aebe67fe646a086b01b6aee2739d2f17d9cf10dced17026Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,841

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
EUCLID TECHLABS, LLC
Proposal award date
2019-02-19
Contract end date
2019-11-18
UEI
J7DNBL8YF4A2
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001940
Topic code
13a

Research abstract

X-ray beamlines at user facilities dynamically change their beam parameters – flux, size, shape and x-ray energy – to meet user needs, often through the use of dynamic focusing elements such as toroidal mirrors. In such cases, the beam optimization procedure is often time consuming and complex, requiring several iterations before the desired beam parameters are obtained. There is a need for beam monitoring devices with fast feedback, calibrated flux response and wide dynamic range, which are capable of imaging the x-ray beam in real time for efficient beam optimization. Specifically, beam profile and flux monitors that absorb less than 10% of the beam energy are needed for online diagnostics. Euclid Techlabs proposes to use commercially available diamond scintillator screens with a standard thickness of 50 microns to record beam fluorescence with camera. Modern scientific cameras with 95% quantum efficiencies achieve an impressive 90 dB dynamic range. This covers reduced signal from ultrathin scintillators. For flux monitoring we propose a more sensitive measurement that is based on a change of the microwave coupling to a high-quality-factor resonator due to x-ray induced conductivity in a scintillator screen. Such measurements were demonstrated recently by Euclid at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source. In Phase I, we will produce a proof-of-principle prototype: a microwave resonator with a fluorescent diamond film inside. The diamond film will be cut to a thickness of 20–50 microns to minimally intercept x-rays. We will measure fluorescence with camera on sample diamond films of various thicknesses to estimate the sensitivity requirements for beam profile measurement. Schedule permitting, we will perform flux measurement with a resonator. The proposed approach is plug and play and can be employed in a large number of x-ray beamlines all over the world. This non-contact flux measurement can potentially eliminate dedicated x-ray flux monitors, which occupy space and block the beam. Beam profile measurement provides an additional functionality for positional feedback. This technology will increase the efficiency of x-ray utilization, simplify sample management, and help with beam delivery and alignment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

99 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $41,359,807. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.