SBIR/STTR Research Award

Oxygen Selective Metal Organic Framework Adsorbents for High Efficiency Air Separation

Award identifier 5aed333d2aea600872f74d3d387a788167672d4f317afee1315ac2b0c5f594f9Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2019-02-19
Contract end date
2019-11-18
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001940
Topic code
23b

Research abstract

While cryogenic ASU is the technology of choice to supply oxygen to large plants, they are very expensive and includes complex hardware that prevent to cost-effective scale down and use in small installations. At small scale, pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is widely used. PSA is based on the selective reversible adsorption of nitrogen (but not oxygen) onto molecular sieve sorbents. The conventional PSA process delivers an expensive product mainly due to the inefficiencies involved in the adsorption of the major component (nitrogen) from a high pressure air and its subsequent discharge at ambient pressure (most of the work input provided during compression is lost). Sandia National Laboratory researchers have recently developed a novel method to synthesize open pored metal organic frameworks (MOFs) which exhibit high selectivity for oxygen. Due to this highly selective to oxygen the separation process could be potentially significantly more energy efficient than conventional PSA process. TDA Research Inc. (TDA) proposes to further develop these new materials into manufacturable, highly effective adsorbents. We will also develop a highly efficient separation process based on their use supported by detailed engineering design and process simulations. In Phase I, we will synthesize the new MOFs at large-scale using high throughput commercial equipment. We will use low energy densification techniques to make pellets or granules while preserving the desired adsorptive properties. We will demonstrate the stable operation of the new material through many cycles under representative conditions. We will design and optimize a cycle sequence that will achieve both high product (oxygen) yield and purity. We will complete a techno-economic analysis to assess the economic merits of the new technology. Oxygen is a strategically important chemical, with a $3.8 billion market value in the U.S. It supports various industrial processes and enters into oxidative combination with many materials. The new technology has the potential to reduce the energy input required for the process by more than 2X, providing a low cost oxygen product.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.