SBIR/STTR Research Award

Remote Repair of Sealed Containers or Dry Storage Casks Containing Used Nuclear Fuel

Award identifier f381303967f859d330ead69f6a8b621c1d4de2c61c4bd00265e5697ee9cf980bAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,795

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2018-08-27
Contract end date
2020-08-26
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001795
Topic code
30b

Research abstract

Currently there are three types of storage systems used to store dry spent fuel: unshielded canisters in vertically-oriented shielded overpacks or silos, unshielded canisters horizontally oriented in concrete modules, and shielded casks. Different types of damage are possible for all three systems. The health and safety of the public will be best protected if the containment and shielding surrounding spent fuel in dry storage remains intact or is restored as soon as possible following a breach. Repairing a damaged storage system if it can be done remotely should provide a significant ALARA benefit compared to removing the fuel and replacing the damaged container since it should reduce the radiation exposure of the personnel involved in the process. If the dry cask storage system were replaced instead of repaired, then there is additional cost associated with disposing of a massive component that may be highly contaminated. A repair process for a damaged system will offer cost savings and a reduction in the radioactive waste produced. The purpose of this project is to develop a working prototype of a remotely operated system for performing repairs on spent fuel dry storage systems. The Phase I project identified the types of damage that could be incurred and determined options for repairing the damage. Based on the studies in Phase I, a concept for a remote repair system was developed that can implement the required repairs. The Phase II work plan is primarily structured around scaling up the Phase I research to full scale hardware; testing a broader range of failure modes and dry storage system geometries; and doing this in an operating environment that closely simulates what will be encountered during a field repair campaign. The concept from Phase I will be fully developed and a prototype system will be fabricated and tested utilizing full-scale, reduced-length non-radioactive canister mockups. The Phase II test program will culminate with at least two simulations; one to represent a horizontal cask and the other to represent a vertical configuration. In these simulations the full-scale, reduced-length, prototype canisters and the prototype repair system will be used to simulate a complete canister repair campaign from start to finish including system setup, canister extraction, defect repair, debris containment, canister reseating, and system teardown.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.