SBIR/STTR Research Award

NDT Techniques for the Evaluation ofTRISO Fuel

Award identifier ed28cc4770723f34ea0efc4b8a70dcc8867bd54a25d9f6af7add551daf70c7d6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$147,723

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2018-07-02
Contract end date
2019-04-01
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001771
Topic code
30b

Research abstract

Advanced gas cooled reactor designs utilizing Tristructural Isotropic (TRISO) fuels continue to be strong avenues for research and testing. However, concerns continue about fabrication defects that can lead to failures during operation. Internal defects in the multi-layer coating of the kernel can lead to fuel failure at the particle or pebble level. Layer integrity is the key to the reliability and usability of all TRISO-based fuel forms. During operation the integrated effects of fuel fissioning, radiation-induced material transformations, and internal pressurize buildup combine to grow and propagate pre-existing internal defects. The consequential failures may lead to the uncontrolled dissemination of fission products through the system. In addition to leading to costly cleanup and repairs of systems, such failures may jeopardize public health and erode public confidence in these technologies. These concerns will continue to exist without a cost effective and systematic means of inspecting every fuel particle to eliminate these failure modes.This proposal advocates for the development and demonstration of two non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for the evaluation and inspection of TRISO fuel particles to detect defects that typically occur in less than 1% of particles. The methodologies and equipment will be developed with the purpose of creating a novel inspection system or systems that can be utilized to further the development and introduction of advanced reactor designs. A successful design will have the capability to detect defects within TRISO fuel particles at a rate suitable for production volumes either individually or in concert and with a high degree of certainty for defect detection. This system or systems must have a capability for automated inspection and disposition of particles on an individual particle basis.The two inspection technologies that NovaTech proposes to evaluate are resonant frequency analysis and thermography. Both of these technologies are non-destructive inspection techniques that are capable of identifying subsurface defects such as cracks, delaminations and voids. However, each technique uses fundamentally different principals to arrive at results. NovaTech believes that in concert these two techniques can provide a robust, efficient and cost effective solution to inspecting TRISO fuel pellets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.