SBIR/STTR Research Award

Spacer Grids for Accident-Tolerant Fuel Assemblies

Award identifier 064b2a26c5f7f4281933e72e427c0f53241d579ed539700a31a0e954d7f2cff0Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,971

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2018-07-02
Contract end date
2019-04-01
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001771
Topic code
30b

Research abstract

Past DOE SBIR programs have shown that accident-tolerant cladding like silicon carbide (SiC) fuel rod cladding can be a durable, less reactive alternative for zirconium alloy cladding for light water reactors. The higher temperature performance and increased safety potential of accident tolerant fuel rod cladding during a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) is expected to both improve the sustainability of the existing fleet of commercial light water reactors and serve as a key building block for future generation reactors.Grid-to-rod fretting is one of the leading causes of fuel rod failure in modern pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel assemblies. SiC cladding, being significantly harder than the zirconium alloys currently used for PWR & BWR fuel rod cladding, should be less prone to fuel rod failure due to fretting if used in conjunction with metallic spacer grids. In fact, it is so hard that the opposite problem now becomes a significant concern; that the vibrating fuel rod will wear away the spring contacts and stops on the zirconium alloy intermediate spacer grids and PWR flow mixing grids, thereby compromising the fundamental positioning function of those grids. Also, attaching zirconium alloy spacer grids to the guide tubes in a PWR can be a challenge if those guide tubes are likewise converted to SiC.Although ongoing efforts have rightly placed priority on proving the accident-tolerant fuel rod cladding viable, concerns over the potential fretting and structural integrity issues associated with the accident- tolerant fuel assembly need to be addressed and resolved in parallel to ensure that implementation is not delayed. An all-SiC structure also simplifies the assembly process for PWR fuel assemblies.The purpose of this project is to develop the manufacturing processes required for a SiC grid assembly. 3D CAD models of a grid assembly concept will be developed. Existing processes for fabrication of SiC fuel rod cladding will be modified as needed to fabricate tubes and flat pieces for grid assemblies. A grid assembly fixture will be developed and one or more grid assemblies will be fabricated. The assemblies will then be characterized and tested. Based on the Phase I results, the processes will be refined and additional analyses and tests will be performed that include full-scale flow tests and irradiation tests.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.