SBIR/STTR Research Award

Tapering Enhanced Stimulated Superradiant Amplification

Award identifier a3d61310d2fe7ce15048634f7468b2faa16279286c007a222959974ad073e3aeAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,888

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2018-05-21
Contract end date
2020-05-20
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001794
Topic code
05b

Research abstract

Over the last decade, Free Electron Laser (FEL) light sources have become an essential component of the world-wide scientific infrastructure and deliver core research capabilities to Users across many scientific disciplines. However, the conventional FEL efficiency is usually limited to a small fraction of 1% at short wavelengths, which is a significant strain on the light source accessibility and performance. Technical Approach In response to this problem, RadiaBeam Technologies and UCLA are developing a novel concept, TESSA (Tapering Enhanced Stimulated Superradiant Amplification), which carries the promise to increase FEL efficiency by over an order of magnitude. By applying a high intensity radiation seed and a novel, strongtapering algorithm, it was shown numerically that TESSA can achieve an overall efficiency as high as 50%. The TESSA concept has only been validated experimentally at 10 μm wavelength, and in this project it will be validated in the ultra-violet frequency range. Phase I Accomplishments During the Phase I, a detailed numerical study of the proposed TESSA experiment was carried out, including optimization of the beam dynamics, and TESSA system. The beamline components and subsystems were designed and optimized, with particular effort placed on the initial design and cost engineering of the tapered helical undulator. Phase II Plan Phase I demonstrated feasibility of the proposed TESSA demonstration at 266 nm, and the project is in a high degree of readiness for the transition into Phase II. In Phase II, the experimental system will be fully engineered and fabricated, and in Year 2 the entire system will be integrated and commissioned at the APS LEA facility. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits A successful TESSA demonstration in the ultraviolet frequency range, can lead to development of novel and significant additional capabilities for the FEL Light Source community. It would also trigger a broader interest towards high efficiency FEL sources, including an interest from emerging industrial applications, such as EUV lithography. For RadiaBeam the realization of TESSA concept, represents an exciting and potentially disruptive commercial opportunity.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.