SBIR/STTR Research Award

Additive Manufacturing of SMR Holddown Springs and Upper Nozzle Interfaces

Award identifier 5f944a66a0d6d1b1a1770d6ffdab82b9e7b8a78784cf9a40ecbdef834e4ca378Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$145,454

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2017-06-12
Contract end date
2017-12-11
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001619
Topic code
30b

Research abstract

Cost and time associated with material waste, quality control, inspection, and manufacturing of nuclear fuel assembly components can be detrimental to nuclear plant design and development. Specifically, holddown springs are prime component examples that inherently carry these issues due to their complex geometries and attachment points. The design engineer must always weigh the manufacturing practices against the operational benefits. To combat this issue, the Department of Energy is highly interested in advancing methods of manufacturing for nuclear energy technologies that allow for easier engineering and commercial production of nuclear fuel assembly component. Proving that complex geometries, holddown springs, can be manufactured with the same design material using additive material technologies shows the nuclear industry that former manufacturing complications are no longer necessary. Additive material technologies also give the designer the option of adding beneficial features to spacer grids and nozzles during the Computer Aided Design (CAD) process that were previously impossible (due to tooling impediments). During Phase I, multiple holddown spring designs that are built out of the upper nozzle will be modeled using CAD, removing the need to produce two separate fuel assembly components. This new composite part will prevent possible thread joint failure and be designed to increase performance with less material. Once modeled, the holddown springs will be analyzed using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in parallel with public-domain holddown springs to compare structural integrity. Lastly, after structural and fatigue have been optimized, the composite holddown spring designs (some incorporating the upper nozzle) will be manufactured using 3D printed, and then tested to record desired properties. Using additive material technologies (i.e. metallic 3D printing) minimizes material waste and inspection time while producing fine-tolerance products – increasing quality – that frees the designers to focus on component operation, not manufacturing (welding, milling, stamping, etc). Proof-of-concept in Phase I will show a 3D printed holddown spring can be placed on a lead test assembly in Phase II, and full production after irradiation testing fuel assemblies with 3D printed holddown springs in Phase III.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.