SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reverberation Mitigation of Speech

Award identifier 230c5cd24abb569ba08fcea142b717eec01c4625490aa57044e034c9f70339a3Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$743,191

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2016-08-30
Contract end date
2018-11-30
UEI
GC7MKAN5DG35
Solicitation number
2015.0
Topic code
AF15-AT17

Research abstract

Speech data corrupted by reverberation, especially in combination with noise, has a drastically negative effect on the performance of speaker identification algorithms. Current approaches to the removal of reverb and noise rely on specific knowledge of room characteristics causing the reverb.The team of In-Depth Engineering and the University of Maryland propose to apply an innovative, generalized, adaptive algorithm for reverberation removal that is based on a model of human sound analysis that occurs in the primary auditory cortex. The Phase I feasibility study showed that the model can be used to provide a robust technique for removing both reverb and noise from speech data. The team proposes to complete the experimentation and analysis initiated in the Phase I effort to optimize the application of the cortical model, making use of real-world reverberated and noisy data from the Air Force, and testing with a speaker identification algorithm (SID).The use of the cortical features to directly generate iVectors to feed the SID will also be explored, and a real-time processing version of the cortical algorithms will be developed.Speech data corrupted by reverberation, especially in combination with noise, has a drastically negative effect on the performance of speaker identification algorithms. Current approaches to the removal of reverb and noise rely on specific knowledge of room characteristics causing the reverb.The team of In-Depth Engineering and the University of Maryland propose to apply an innovative, generalized, adaptive algorithm for reverberation removal that is based on a model of human sound analysis that occurs in the primary auditory cortex. The Phase I feasibility study showed that the model can be used to provide a robust technique for removing both reverb and noise from speech data. The team proposes to complete the experimentation and analysis initiated in the Phase I effort to optimize the application of the cortical model, making use of real-world reverberated and noisy data from the Air Force, and testing with a speaker identification algorithm (SID).The use of the cortical features to directly generate iVectors to feed the SID will also be explored, and a real-time processing version of the cortical algorithms will be developed.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

50 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2025). Reported award amounts total $35,435,692. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.