SBIR/STTR Research Award

GHZ Electron Buncher Compatible With Commericals TEMS For Strobosopic Imaging With Space-time Resolution Between 10-23 And 10-20 M S (TOPIC 7A)

Award identifier a4519e2330797b7dc005bc78d8f042695e7c0057c0bab681eaa504402130ae94Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,966

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
EUCLID TECHLABS, LLC
Proposal award date
2016-04-11
Contract end date
2018-04-10
UEI
J7DNBL8YF4A2
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001405
Topic code
07a

Research abstract

Currently, space-time resolution (STR) in the range 10-21 to 10-22 m∙s is available exclusively at free electron laser facilities, or by a few laser microscopes based on high harmonic generation. In practice, these tools have limited accessibility due to exorbitant equipment costs or meager beam time allocations. Because such record STR enables absolutely novel physics and emerging behavior in materials, these difficulties make it incredibly hard to accomplish large sets of experiments and cross validate new findings by the same group of researchers or within inter-laboratory collaborations. How the problem is being addressed: We propose to build the first prototype of a GHz stroboscopic TEM with STR ~10-20-10-23 m∙s, which is comparable or better than the STRs available at existing user facilities. Furthermore, the proposed system will be an affordable tool based on a standard TEM platform. This proposal is focused on bringing together two mature technologies, the CW-kicker-based electron buncher and the TEM, to make an accessible and fundamentally different stroboscopic instrument for imaging periodic processes. The new tool will have GHz sampling rate and time resolution in the 100 fs to 100 ps range, while preserving the unique spatial resolution of TEM. Unique measurements will become possible for many laboratories around the world to significantly improve technological outcome of scientific findings. What will be done in Phase I: In Phase I we will design and fabricate electromagnetic cavity buncher and perform its cold tests (to confirm target frequency and resonator quality factor) in that it is ready for installations in the existing TEM at BNL in Phase II. We will also provide electromagnetic design and electron beam dynamics simulation taking into account actual TEM architecture, and design synchronizing circuitry/electronics. Applications and benefits: Because electron microscopy is not only high spatial resolution imaging tool, but also a platform for a variety of analytical methods, such as EDS and EELS, there are endless application opportunities for GHz stroboscopic microscopy in energy and electronics research to resolve electron and ionic transport in advanced functional materials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

99 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $41,359,807. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.