SBIR/STTR Research Award

Mobile Target Secondary Debris (MTSD)

Award identifier 4aef41f8e99ff5398fbb3767bea9b567e4838b5ca407603a9d5bc3bf9e9ef1ebAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,499,941

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
KARAGOZIAN & CASE, INC.
Proposal award date
2015-09-30
Contract end date
2015-12-29
UEI
YALRJKQFU481
Solicitation number
2012.1
Topic code
AF121-095

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:The objective of the project is to develop models for secondary debris generated by mobile targets. This includes the vehicle component breakup due to expanding high explosives and primary fragments as well as the associated airblast that propagates into the environment propelling secondary fragments from the vehicle. The overall scope of the project involves developing the computational and testing methodologies needed to generate mobile target secondary debris (MTSD) data, generating a suite of virtual or real test data, and develop a limited-scope prototype software tool suitable for MTSD that is available for use at the conclusions of the project. The scope involves (1) developing HFPB computational methodologies capable of computing the detonation of the explosive, the breakup of the weapon casing, the expansion of the detonation products, the fracture and breakup of the pickup truck components, and the residual blast and debris fly out into the environment including the effects of air drag.; (2) outline the data collection and cataloging process needed for a typical MTSD test; (3) generating a suite of data for use in developing a limited-scope MTSD fast-running model; (4) developing a limited-scope prototype software tool suitable for weaponeering applications.BENEFIT:The objectives at the conclusion of this SBIR effort are to produce a fast-running tool for predicting MTSD and publication of accepted methodologies and procedures for cost effective testing and collection of secondary debris data to support future FRM enhancement, development, and/or validation. The published reports will be a complete recipe for test instrumentation and setup, data collection, data reduction, modeling and simulation, FRM development, and validation and verification related to secondary debris generated from blast events. Such publications would be a valuable resource to the Government, in particular the DoD, and contractors that support the government as well as private companies that handle explosives or use industrial processes with an associated blast hazards. Such companies have an interest to quantify and mitigate secondary debris collateral damage from accidental explosions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

80 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2025). Reported award amounts total $44,859,149. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.