SBIR/STTR Research Award

End-of-Service Life Indicator (ESLI)

Award identifier bfbc5f1e06f1482dae768f863b3e47196991c60412a81797260e965fd3762a15Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Award amount

$992,485

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2014-09-01
Contract end date
2016-08-31
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
PA13-234
Topic code
NIOSH

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION provided by applicant Industrial workers must be able to function in environments where chemical hazards are present Thus they need protection against hazardous chemicals used in the workplace Particularly relevant is the use of respiratory protection for environments where workers are exposed to chemical vapors gases In most cases respiratory protection consists of a respirator face mask that is equipped with replaceable filter beds known as cartridges For these types of respirator masks once a cartridgeandapos s capacity for adsorbing chemicals is used up the expired cartridge can simply be thrown away and replaced with a fresh unused cartridge Unfortunately there is no reliable way to determine when the filter cartridge has expired thus the wearer is often exposed to the vapors after the cartridge is saturated but before it is replaced An OSHA standard for respirator cartridge use requires that employers provide either a rigorous change out schedule or use a National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health NIOSH certified end of service life indicator ESLI to determine when a respirator cartridge needs to be replaced Because no reliable certified commercially available ESLI has been developed employers rely on respirator change out schedules These schedules however are often inaccurate and unreliable because the input parameters used to calculate the lifetime of the cartridges are rarely accurately known As a result wearers of the mask often do not follow the change out schedules and are frequently exposed to chemical vapors prior to changing respirator cartridges Further the Bureau of Labor Statistics and NIOSH surveys show that some of all the workers determine their own respirator change out schedules which is against OSHA regulations An effective NIOSH approved ESLI technology that warns the user of impending contaminant breakthrough would provide an unambiguous means of safely determining when a respirator cartridge should be replaced To date however there is no commercial ESLI technology for respirator cartridges that responds to the types of contaminants that are prevalent in common industrial environments Should this technology be available in respirator cartridges not only would an ESLI prevent the harm to workers that is caused by incidental overexposure to vapors but it would be attractive to employers because it would eliminate the added expenses incurred from unnecessary replacement of partially used cartridges resulting from conservative change out schedules In summary an effective ESLI technology would improve the safety of the more than million annual respirator cartridge users in the U S and it would be adopted because it saved money an effective but expensive system would do little to improve safety because few companies would use it In the Phase I project TDA has developed and demonstrated a colorimetric ESLI that changes color in response to organic vapors acid gases and basic gases In the Phase II proposal TDA proposes to further develop the end of service life indicator ESLI and incorporate it into prototype respirator cartridges with the help of our collaborators PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE No simple technology has yet been developed that allows the user of a respirator to determine if the chemical protection capability of its respirator filter cartridge has been reduced by exposure during storage or by saturation with gases while it is in use As a result many workers who are required to use respirator protection are at risk for chemical exposure because the filter cartridge change out schedules are not reliable surveys show that up to of the users simply change their cartridge when they smell a breakthrough In this proposal TDA proposes to further develop an end of service life indicator ESLI that visually signals the wearer that a respirator filter cartridge is about to expire thus unambiguously providing a safe reliable means of determining that a respirator filter cartridge is at the end of its service life and needs to be replaced

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.