SBIR/STTR Research Award

Adaptive Trustworthiness Calibration Interface (ATCI)

Award identifier 7a5f48ea8590ff86f4481f715d8b4956bb1658806d13271b5e09ab19001d7ea7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,998

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
PERCEPTRONICS SOLUTIONS, INC
Proposal award date
2013-09-04
Contract end date
2015-08-26
UEI
MKQPJJKHDG89
Solicitation number
2012.1
Topic code
AF121-031

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This proposal is for Phase II continuation of research and development for an Adaptive Trustworthiness Calibration Interface (ATCI) for Cyber Warfare and Supervisory Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Our Phase II proposal is based on a complete understanding of the problem to be solved, a solid record of achievement in Phase I, and a comprehensive and achievable Phase II Work Plan. The ATCI program goal is to enhance a system operator's decision making by providing trust cues so that his or her perceived trustworthiness of system matches its actual trustworthiness, thus yielding calibrated trust. Our approach to meeting this goal is to provide the operator with visualization tools to diagnose the actual trustworthiness of the system by showing the risk and uncertainty of the associated information. We measure and model the trust of the operator in real-time, and adapt the display so that an operator who incorrectly trusts too much is encouraged to trust less, and an operator who incorrectly mistrusts is encouraged to trust more. By focusing on both individual operator"s trust and the transparency of the system, we realize calibrated trust for optimal decision-making to support operators during all phases of mission execution. BENEFIT: In this project we are addressing these several challenges by developing ATCI tools for trustworthiness calibration in a variety of cases, including the management and control of multiple, heterogeneous UAV platforms. Our ATCI tools will include innovative trustworthiness diagnosis displays, an adaptive interface controller, and real-time measurement and modeling of trust. To accomplish this we will design, develop, demonstrate and evaluate the ATCI first in a developmental setting and then in scenario-based, human-in-the-loop field evaluations. We will provide the AFRL with a standalone experimental station deliverable that will permit investigators to continue development and testing of the ATCI tools. And finally, we will pursue specific dual-use military and civilian applications of the ATCI products to rapidly transition the ATCI technology and leverage the capabilities of operators in a variety of automated systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

151 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2026). Reported award amounts total $79,474,277. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.