SBIR/STTR Research Award

Warm Gas Multi-contaminant Removal System

Award identifier 1da4858183ebd94e62b96814731a6cdb9fc4be401c140ae7f0556ab2db4384e7Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2013-08-14
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000880
Topic code
15b

Research abstract

Gasification technologies convert coal and biomass into synthesis gas feed streams that can either be used as a fuel for highly efficient power generation cycles or converted into value-added chemicals and transportation fuels. However, coal-derived synthesis gas contains a myriad of contaminants that may be regulated in power plant emissions and act as poisons for the catalysts used in downstream chemical manufacturing processes. TDA Research, Inc. (TDA) proposes to develop a low-cost, high capacity, sorbent that can remove ammonia and hydrogen cyanide (NH3 and HCN, the acid rain precursors) and the trace metal contaminants (such as mercury, arsenic and selenium) from the synthesis gas in a single process step. Unlike the commercially available gas clean-up technologies, our multi-contaminant control system operates at 240oC (464oF), above the dew point of the synthesis gas; operating above the dewpoint improves process efficiency and reduces capital costs. In Phase I, TDA developed a new sorbent that can remove multiple contaminants from simulated synthesis gas streams with high capacity and removal efficiency. We ran the sorbent life through 50 absorption/regeneration cycles under representative conditions without any degradation in performance. In a preliminary engineering analysis, we also showed the economic viability of the new high temperature synthesis gas clean-up system against conventional low temperature scrubbers. During Phase II we will continue to improve the performance of our sorbent and scale-up its production using commercial manufacturing techniques. We will demonstrate the viability of the system in a prototype slipstream test unit using actual coal-derived synthesis gas. We will also carry out a detailed system analysis and engineering assessment to fully quantify the benefits of the new technology. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The use of coal-derived synthesis gas in power generation is an emerging technology with significant commercial potential, because gasification-based power cycles operates with much higher efficiency than conventional pulverized coal combustion plants.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.