SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Filtration to Improve Single Crystal Casting Yield

Award identifier c321f38d6ec33d20536e07489be6b628700b6488ac8705728acbbdc4caed1288Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,977

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Mikro Systems, Inc.
Proposal award date
2013-08-14
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
R34XDKSM3KU9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000880
Topic code
18a

Research abstract

Modern gas turbines must operate at higher temperatures in order to achieve better fuel efficiency and reduce emissions. To achieve maximum performance, components must be made of Nickel super-alloys and must be cast as single crystals. Although single crystal casting yields have improved, they have not improved sufficiently to enable wide-spread use of single crystal super-alloys in industrial gas turbines (IGT), primarily due to low yields. Innovative approaches to increase the yield are needed. Mikro Systems proposes to apply its patented Tomo Lithographic Molding (TOMO) process to produce superior ceramic filters that are used to remove the impurities during the molten metal pouring step in the casting process. Improved filtration will increase the yield and ultimately lower the cost of these critical and costly high technology parts. A 1% improvement in casting yield could lead to annual savings over $10 million in the U.S. alone. During Phase I Mikro demonstrated the technical feasibility of producing advanced designs for pour cup and inline filters using TOMO. Until now, these designs could not be produced due to limitations in current manufacturing methods. Flow tests of Mikro filters demonstrated much lower variability in flow rate and pressure drop from filter-to- filter compared with off-the-shelf filters. Flow rates during single crystal casting are critically linked to the metal solidification process, which is directly tied to production yield for turbine blades. The primary Phase II objectives are to optimize materials and filter designs to be ready for industry standard single crystal casting. This will include extensive testing and modeling, and will conclude with foundry casting of an advanced turbine blade to evaluate and compare the new filter performance with current filters. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Advanced filters have application in investment casting of turbine components for IGT as well as the much larger aero turbine markets. This will improve the yield and lower costs for single crystal casting and can be expanded to other casting processes and products. Investment casting is a multi-billion dollar global market.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

23 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2016). Reported award amounts total $10,014,920. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.