SBIR/STTR Research Award

Computational Process Model Development for Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM)

Award identifier d8d8237c757b7b1e6c6e257534aee9fb00da23d61d3ff77050215f3abd3b1d62Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,655

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Mound Laser & Photonics Center, Inc.
Proposal award date
2013-06-03
Contract end date
2015-06-03
UEI
HLL3FPWKBJK3
Solicitation number
2012.1
Topic code
AF121-130

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Powder-bed based additive manufacturing (AM) technologies typically involve rapid solidification after a laser or electron beam melts a region of powder. Although parameters can be optimized for lowest cost, highest precision, or optimum microstructure, these optimizations require trade-offs between scan rate, layer thickness, bed heating, and use of support materials. The University of Louisville"s (U of L) Dislocation Density based Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Method (DDCP-FEM) enhanced in Phase I for Ti64 materials to predict local and global strengths, grain morphologies, and other layer-by-layer interfacial characteristics will be enhanced for Co-Cr including a detailed Design of Experiments, and developed support structure optimization. By coupling this model with a selective laser melting (SLM) process development cell, constructed at Mound Laser & Photonics Center (MLPC), parameters determined by the software will be experimentally tested, validated, and used for input in the iterative model. Upon validation between model and development cell, an OEM selected component will be fabricated using a commercial SLM station at U of L. Scientific Simulation Systems (S^3) will port the Phase II model to a high performance computing system in addition to programming a usable interface to facilitate commercialization transition. BENEFIT: Due to the lengthy development time and cost found in current direct digital manufacturing (DDM) technologies, the proposed work would provide savings in cost and time for fabricating complex components from a digital design. Commercial propulsion and airframe applications stand to greatly benefit from improved DDM especially by the elimination of tooling, dies, and casting molds. The time savings for engineering development in the form of rapid prototyping of designs as well as complex geometries that do not lend themselves to conventional machining techniques would greatly benefit both commercial and military applications. With the addition of a high performance computing system, the modeling process will be real-time during fabrication of components.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

36 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2015). Reported award amounts total $11,357,971. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.