SBIR/STTR Research Award

IP Satellite Network Architecture for Effective TCP Performance

Award identifier 4711034117d2c48d652a3220b2626dff4277e90092c9f2675152be869e262552Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,966

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
Proposal award date
2012-05-08
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
C12TQVKF5413
Solicitation number
2011.B
Topic code
AF11-BT12

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Satellite networks provide high bandwidth global communications without relying on existing infrastructure. Current satellite system use is impeded by round trip delays and limited ground access points. Future IP based LEO/MEO satellite networks offer smaller delays and flexible, high capability communications. Propagation delays, highly dynamic links, higher error rates, dynamic satellite access points for ground and airborne users, potential satellite losses, and limited Onboard processing capability all challenge current routing and TCP protocols. In this project we extend routing algorithms, develop new TCP methods, and use DTN methods to surmount these problems. The TCP methods are designed to be compatible with IPSec and do not require changes in existing TCP modules. In Phase I, we start with widely cited IP LEO/MEO satellite network algorithms developed by academic partner Prof. E. Ekici of Ohio State University and TCP methods from other SSCI projects. In Phase II, we extend the Phase I algorithms, and throughly characterize their performance. Prof. Ekici's expertise in satellite routing and satellite network capabilities and architecture, combined with SSCI's work in applying DTN methods and improving TCP effiency in wireless networks will ensure a successful Phase I feasibility demonstration and development of effective methods in Phase II. BENEFIT: The protocols developed in this effort will be suitable for inclusion in future IP-based military satellite systems. The TCP and other protocols developed in this effort do not assume that IP headers can be read in the interior of the satellite networks; Instead they use information obtained from queries to routing modules (using metric and other data collected and distributed through the routing modules). Specific header information is used only at the network edge and the queries do not directly obtain network topology information. These features will help ensure compatability with IPSec and other security measures in military networks. The measures will improve performance in emergency networks and other wireless networks subject to interference, unreliable communications nodes, power limitations and intermittent outages.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

464 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $186,567,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.