SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Power Iodine Hall Thruster

Award identifier 1aaba91d99a363751b2fd6f3c50bf3fc97e91ac2f00bd11dd63c300dfd922d7fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,989

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
BUSEK CO., INC.
Proposal award date
2011-11-14
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SATYSBWG3FL7
Solicitation number
2011.2
Topic code
AF112-177

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: A high power iodine propellant Hall Effect thruster system will be developed for orbit raising and other in-space applications. This system will include a thruster, hollow cathode, and propellant feed system. The Phase I thruster will have a power level of 1-3 kW. The Phase II thruster will be tested at up to 20-kW, enabling near-term clusters of 80 to 160 kW. The estimated specific power (kg/kW) will be 1.3 kg/kW. A 100 kW Phase III system will also be designed, with even lower specific power. The thruster will be capable of specific impulse between 1400 s and 3500 s at constant power. Based on subscale iodine testing, the efficiency will be similar to that of existing high power Xe Hall thrusters, with the possibility for significantly higher thrust to power. Based on high fidelity testing of Busek"s existing 20-kW Xe Hall thruster, the efficiency will be greater than 60% across a broad throttling range of power and specific impulse. The iodine propellant will store at a density that is 2 to 3 times greater than xenon and at approximately one thousandth of the pressure. Passive long term storage of a fully fueled system will be possible. BENEFIT: The proposed system will be used for orbit raising and other in-space applications. The thruster will meet specific mass and performance targets set forth in the topic, including a specific impulse of 1400 s to 3500 s, and efficiency greater than 60% across a broad throttling range. Higher T/P than possible with Xe may be achieved. In addition, the complete system, including iodine fuel tank, will be far smaller than a xenon system, making it more suitable for high propellant throughput applications. The system will also be storable long-term on the ground or on orbit without any active temperature control due to the condensable nature of the propellant. The system will be low cost due to the elimination of high pressure tanks normally used to store noble gases at thousands of PSI, as well as the low cost of the propellant itself. Finally, due to the condensability of the propellant, the system can be tested at high power in ground facilities that would be incapable of testing xenon thrusters in a similar power range.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

248 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $87,675,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.