SBIR/STTR Research Award

Thermal Improvement on 1 Newton ASCENT Thruster Valve Assembly (TVA)

Award identifier b5afbf73a8f694808991fc87117fd6ad435549c34e1766766796d35497a5eb58Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,964

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
BUSEK CO., INC.
Proposal award date
2024-02-15
Contract end date
2026-03-02
UEI
SATYSBWG3FL7
Solicitation number
21.2
Topic code
AF212-0011

Research abstract

Traditionally, monopropellant thrusters rely on thermally conductive copper straps to shunt heat away from the injector tube or injector flange. Such passive techniques, although adequate for hydrazine thrusters, have proven difficult to implement for the new generation of green monopropellant thrusters. This is because unlike hydrazine, green monopropellants such as ASCENT are not capable of cold starts and require significant catbed preheating. During the preheat, the thermal straps contend with the catbed heater by shunting heat away. For many thruster designers, this is an accepted limitation because there is no alternative. Making matters worse, the thermal straps are often oversized for the largest thermal-load scenario (usually steady-state firing), which leads to substantial increases in catbed heater power and energy consumption during preheating. The longer heater ON time also prevents responsive start-up from the cold condition. Furthermore, passive thermal straps may be too slow to counteract fast transient heat loads (e.g., post-firing soak-backs), which in certain situations can cause a thruster to fail upon shut down or during hot restarts. Busek, with partner Exo-Atmospheric Technologies (Exo-AT), has developed a new thermal management system in Phase I that can potentially solve these industry-wide issues. The invention utilizes a thermal switching device that is “inactive” during catalyst bed pre-heat, and “turns on” after thruster ignition. In the Phase I proof-of-concept test, the new thermal switch system was installed on Busek’s existing 0.5N ASCENT green monoprop thruster BGT-X5, and a catalyst pre-heat test was performed in a simulated space environment. The thruster’s catalyst bed demonstrated the ability to heat up in less time compared to traditional copper straps. Furthermore, finite element thermal analysis (FEA) suggests that the thruster’s injector tube can maintain significantly cooler temperatures during hot fire and soak-back. In Phase II, the proof-of-concept system will be hot fire tested with BGT-X5, gathering valuable data to anchor the FEA thermal model. Then, the whole system (thermal switch and thruster) will be scaled up to the 1N level for another hot fire demonstration test.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

248 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $87,675,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.