SBIR/STTR Research Award

Predicting Structural Debris and Secondary Air-Blast

Award identifier c5d2b49bcf4c24d5955c0cc6313b8c4c8e9fe82fe725fee5dbc883878a22490eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,475

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
KARAGOZIAN & CASE, INC.
Proposal award date
2011-10-15
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YALRJKQFU481
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-131

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This proposal is for a 24-month Phase II project to develop innovative High-Fidelity Physics-Based (HFPB) Fast-Running Models (FRMs) that simulate the interaction of weapons with structural components of buildings and predict their secondary debris and air blast into adjoining spaces. As stated in Air Force Topic AF103-131, the disintegration of overloaded walls and slabs generates two important secondary effects that can be lethal to personnel, equipment, and structural components located in adjoining rooms; the first is secondary debris from fragmentation of the wall/slab component and the second is secondary air blast that can, in many circumstances, interact with the disintegrating wall and project blast and dynamic pressure loadings. Current HFPB FRMs that are used to predict weapons effectiveness or assess human or building lethality do not account for these effects. This can have negative impacts on collateral damage estimation and weaponeering activities. The DoD needs a new generation of FRMs to improve their prediction capabilities in these areas. BENEFIT: Given the generality of the analysis and fast-running modeling technology proposed, many non-military applications are possible. One possibility is enhanced risk analysis tools for accidental blast responses of civil structures. K & C has already marketed some of our FRM codes and engineering services to government and commercial clients. Other potential customers include the Department of State, the Secret Service, DHS, DDESB, FAA, GSA, and all agencies for which consideration of multiple threats is of interest. The general ability to consider the damage imparted to a component either by successive applications of a single type of threat (e.g., blast) or a combination of threats (e.g., blast followed by a high-energy impact load) is going to be of interest to many who need to consider the risks associated with multiple hazards. This capability, for example, would interest first responders and could be included in DHS programs for developing rapid assessment tools to evaluate the safety of structures that have been involved in situations involving multiple hazards.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

80 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2025). Reported award amounts total $44,859,149. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.