SBIR/STTR Research Award

Ultra-High Surface Area Architecture for Thermal Energy Storage

Award identifier e4abf831096b6dd8561c389755883740824d74af41ba4459bb8caa92b29a8f9bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,951

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
MAINSTREAM ENGINEERING CORP
Proposal award date
2011-08-29
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YR8FJBGXWRR1
Solicitation number
2010.B
Topic code
AF10-BT32

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The Air Force is currently seeking improvements in capacity and responsiveness of Thermal Energy Storage (TES) systems. Current research and development with Phase Change Materials (PCM) in carbon foam and pelletization of metal (i.e. copper) encapsulated metal hydrides seek to overcome these limitations by increasing the thermal conductivity (i.e. copper, carbon) while also increasing the surface area-to-volume ratio (i.e. foam, micro-encapsulation). Unfortunately, these methods still have drawbacks. For PCM in carbon foam, the volume change during phase transition ruptures internal ligaments. For copper-encapsulated metal hydrides, the pelletizing of micro-encapsulated MH creates excessive interfacial boundaries. Both occurrences limit the overall thermal conductivity. Mainstream"s approach combines high burst pressure (104 atm) nano-cylinders, metal hydride deposition (yielding high surface area-to-volume ratio), and high thermal conductivity attributed to nano-structured carbon. The Phase I effort focuses on fabrication of the high surface area storage media and demonstration of storage capacity. The Phase II effort will focus on the TES system architecture. BENEFIT: Increasing the heat removal capacity for high-density variable heat loads, such as that found aboard avionic systems, remains a major technical challenge for NASA, military, and civilian applications. The raw storage heat capacity of metal-hydrides surpass that of most latent- and bond-based thermal storage materials except the latent heat of vaporization of water and in some cases ammonia. Furthermore, the heat input rate (i.e. thermal responsiveness) associated with absorption kinetics exceeds that of conduction-dominated latent heat of fusion. However, when the entire thermal energy storage (TES) system is compared, metal hydride TES cannot match paraffin based TES in capacity due to the required gas storage (for reversible systems) and large core structure (i.e. metal hydride heat exchanger). The current STTS effort is significant as it will overcome the remaining obstacles (i.e. low thermal conductivity and low surface area-to-volume ratio of the metal hydrides) for producing a field-deployable metal-hydride TES for avionic systems, such as directed energy weapons. The application of a thermal responsive, energy dense TES would be applicable to Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) such as High-Powered Microwaves and High Energy Lasers as well low duty cycle electronics.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

518 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2025). Reported award amounts total $184,860,329. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.