SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an SRF Crab Crossing Cavity for an Electron Ion Collider

Award identifier c7f7cf87569293fad53f4dbd9fde87a80203255351f0397e9534055cec15abe4Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Niowave, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-08-15
Contract end date
2013-08-14
UEI
WJLJSN2AT8P1
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000161
Topic code
45 c

Research abstract

The highest priority in the Nuclear Physics program is, at present, the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams. In the longer term it is likely that a high priority will be an Electron Ion Collider, and several concepts are under development. In order to achieve the high luminosities that would be required to make such a machine attractive, some kind of bunch crabbing system will be required. For example, the Electron Ion Collider under study at Jefferson Lab would require a crabbing voltage between 20 and 50 MV at either 499 or 1497 MHz. RF crabbing systems are important components in linear colliders where the beams meet at an angle. A crabbing system rotates the bunches at the collision point so they meet head-on, instead of crossing at an angle, thus restoring and increasing the luminosity. The requirements for a crabbing system for an Electron Ion Collider, as envisaged at Jefferson Lab, are quite stringent, exceeding what has been accomplished so far. A crabbing system could, in principle, be built using room temperature cavities. However, in order to produce the needed voltage a large number of cavities and their associated rf power system would be required. An attractive alternative solution would be based on a superconducting cavity of a new design that has been introduced recently. This new design, if optimized for this application, could provide the required deflecting voltage in a footprint that would be compatible with the design of the interaction regions. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: This STTR research would continue ODU, JLab, and Niowaves collaboration by developing multi-spoke structures for future facilities. Phase I would develop the accelerating structure and cryomodule design and its requirements based on systems efficiency, beam dynamics simulations, and higher order mode (HOM) analysis. Phase II would finalize the cryomodule design and prototype critical aspects of the system such as the SRF cavities, power coupler, HOM spectrum and frequency tuners. Phase III would be funded by an R & amp;D program to complete the full module and test in realistic accelerator conditions. At this point, the system would be marketed internationally to existing and planned facilities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

58 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2020). Reported award amounts total $27,594,609. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.