SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Propellants for Variable Thrust/Isp Colloid Thrusters

Award identifier f54611c4047d4d4f95aa9871cc760bbfb4d633000e4c645429c737dd0be52c1bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$499,994

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2011-03-30
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
2008.B
Topic code
AF08-BT09

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Advanced spacecraft will demand thrusters that provide both extremely efficient operation for attitude control and high thrust for orbital transfer maneuvers, albeit with lower specific impulse. The colloid thruster, the most efficient of the electric thruster concepts, forms a Taylor cone to emit charged particles and produce thrust. Colloid thrusters typically emit charged droplets and accelerate them to high velocity. Pure ion emission mode only occurs with highly conducting fluids, such as the ionic liquids (ILs). In this mode the thruster emits only ions and therefore, thrust is lower, but the specific impulse and propulsive efficiency are much higher. Unfortunately, only a few propellants can emit pure ions and the reasons for this are not fully understood. Therefore, in Phase I TDA Research and the University of Colorado developed a model to correlate fundamental physical properties of ILs with their ability to emit in these regimes. We then used the model to identify new propellants that will improve colloid thruster performance, and ran tests in our Electric Propulsion Vacuum Facility that demonstrated that our model could successfully identify new propellants that function as ion emitters. In Phase II we will specifically design and demonstrate propellants that can vary the thrust by allowing a single thruster with a single fuel to operate, on demand, in either the droplet or ion mode. BENEFIT: Colloid thruster propulsion system(s) that can efficiently produce either high or low thrust levels on-demand will enable the deployment of spacecraft able to provide low-cost communications, space research and surveillance. Further, of the electric propulsion systems, only the colloid thruster can be miniaturized for use in nanosats. Because many small, low-cost nanosats can be put into orbit at once,"constellations"offer flexibility and redundancy in mission programming. The loss of one satellite will have little effect on the performance of the entire system. The development of affordable colloid thruster systems that utilize the propellants to be developed in this project will provide the performance needed to perform these missions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.