SBIR/STTR Research Award

Variable-Isp Ionic Liquid Electrospray Thruster

Award identifier 33ee7354719acf49101a0476eaf98339d49f8ab885ad485eca915753efcde195Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$500,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
BUSEK CO., INC.
Proposal award date
2010-11-10
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SATYSBWG3FL7
Solicitation number
2008.B
Topic code
AF08-BT09

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Busek proposes, with the MIT Space Propulsion Lab, to leverage successful Phase I proof-of-concept results to develop and deliver a 1mN, micro-fabricated electrospray thruster that features variable Isp and bi-polar operation. The thruster achieves variable Isp at no power penalty by innovative use of a deceleration grid, and operating in purely ionic mode so as to overcome many of the grid-contamination life-limiting issues that impeded true MEMS development in the past. Applying this novel deceleration grid concept solves the problem of obtaining lower ISP during ionic operation. The development effort shall focus upon optimizing thruster emitter and grid geometries in order to ameliorate grid interception problems encountered in the Phase I. Once suitable geometries have been established, a true MEMS thruster shall be fabricated and characterized. Supporting the testing effort shall be development of an integrated bipolar switching PPU/DCIU in order to enable direct thrust measurements on Busek"s magnetically-levitated thrust stand. At the conclusion of the Phase II program, Busek and MIT shall deliver a 1mN prototype micro-fabricated thruster, powered by a bipolar switching PPU/DCIU and capable of an Isp range of 500 to 5000s. BENEFIT: Features of the proposed effort are: a colloid thruster able to operate only in ionic mode; variable Isp operation spanning 500-5000 seconds; and constant power operation. The benefit of purely ionic operation is that it avoids the inefficiencies of mixed-mode (droplet + ion) operation. Variable Isp provides versatility in a single thruster system, allowing for operations such as highly mass-efficient station-keeping as well as rapid maneuver that would otherwise require multiple systems. Constant power operation allows for simplification of power electronics design as well as reduced demands on the spacecraft bus, where variable power thrusters complicate power allocation and margin requirements. The concept promises to enable true MEMS fabrication of a practical colloid thruster, a goal that to date has been elusive due to challenges in obtaining low-Isp operation without debilitating thruster grid contamination

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

248 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $87,675,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.