SBIR/STTR Research Award

Distributed Battle Data Networks (DBDN)

Award identifier c17789d28f2bc0e2d8ef2405bfb33445f224d98ac899aff2e08cfcc8e22fe6b8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$92,962

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
Proposal award date
2011-01-20
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
C12TQVKF5413
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-189

Research abstract

Evolving strategies for distributed EW rely critically on data networks, to communicate emitter detections and geolocations between sensors and C2 and tactical assets. Network reliability has been assumed in strategy development. However, standard IP networks may suffer data loss, delay, and congestion when node mobility, disruption, or loss results in intermittent connectivity. SSCI has developed unique, integrated disruption tolerant routing for airborne networks with intermittent connectivity. The routing methods maintain global, persistent views of network assets and link availability. In this effort SSCI will adapt and expand these technologies to enable EW networks, even if impaired, to continue performing essential tasks. Further, we will combine this expanded network view with awareness of the network EW tasks, node capabilities, data dependencies, and priorities to design routing extensions that will further ensure that EW networks complete essential tasks. We will be assisted in this effort by BBN Technologies, the principle developer of the original ARPANET. Their long history of expertise in TCP/IP, WAN and MANET routing, and Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN), combined with SSCI's background in mobile DTN networking, data fusion, and EW geolocation methods, will ensure a successful Phase I feasibility demonstration, Phase II prototype, and Phase III transition. BENEFIT: Current EW sensor networks lose data when nodes temporarily lose network connectivity due to malfunctions, enemy action, mobility, or traffic congestion. There is a need for new routing methods that account for sensor node availability, use it in packet forwarding, and provide network users and managers with a full picture of the network for selecting data fusion methods to ensure that high priority enemy targets are detected, identified, and tracked. In addition to EW, the methods developed here are applicable to Homeland Defense sensor networks and commercial or personal applications where sensors are vulnerable to suppression or environmental degradation.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

464 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $186,567,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.