SBIR/STTR Research Award

Theoretical Innovations in Combining Analytical, Experimental, and Computational Combustion Stability Analysis

Award identifier b230f6e5dc3603b086807459ffb305f5e04c7c5e339a0b1b91eb3779d73b6d2bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,995

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
HYPERCOMP INC
Proposal award date
2010-05-12
Contract end date
2011-01-12
UEI
QMJPFJBH61C7
Solicitation number
2009.B
Topic code
AF09-BT38

Research abstract

Combustion stability is an important consideration in the design of liquid rocket engines. While fundamental modes of unstable operation in simple geometries are easily identified using analytical methods, recent times have seen these methods greatly expand in scope, applied in semi-numerical format to increasingly complex geometries and flow situations. Much remains to be explored in understanding the role of chemistry and turbulence interaction, nonlinear effects and coupled unstable modes and such others. While analytical models and CFD have largely been kept apart by convention, some recent advances have begun to pave the way for their effective integration. The generalized use of the Galerkin approach to complex physics has enabled a straightforward usage of eigen-functions to preempt numerical solutions such that each solution yields greater physical insight into the problem. We propose here a series of advancements to make combustion stability analysis more efficient by a natural coupling between analysis, CFD and experiments. Among others, these methods will include: the use of reduced basis methods, the ability to model uncertainty in flow calculations, high order accurate and efficient calculations of flows in complex geometries. This research will be performed jointly by HyPerComp Inc. and the Computational Combustion Laboratory at Georgia Tech. BENEFIT: Work proposed here has a broad appeal to manufacturers of solid and liquid propellant rocket motors as well as gas turbine engines. These are significant markets and will be able to sustain a niche software suite to be developed. An effective modeling strategy and an integrated simulation environment can result in tremendous cost savings in trial and error testing. Specifically, the combustion stability application will serve as a front runner to promote HyPerComp Inc.’s upcoming product line of very high order accurate simulation software for multiphysics, a first in the industry. Allied technologies such as uncertainty modeling and reduced basis methods will bring new energy into an otherwise routine set of modeling applications currently in vogue.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

104 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $50,844,711. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.