SBIR/STTR Research Award

Precision Miniature Attitude Determination and Control System

Award identifier 5d931a2d777ba27d2077ae01ab954ab878710654fe62a4acaef520738d238b27Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,989

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Maryland Aerospace, Inc.
Proposal award date
2010-01-21
Contract end date
2011-01-21
UEI
WQ2HKAR812S9
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-070

Research abstract

A self contained Precision Attitude Determination and Control System (PADACS) for CubeSats and Nanosats is proposed. The PADACS enables future CubeSat missions with precision fine pointing (0.1„a) and dynamic slewing as will be required for imaging operations of ground targets. The PADACS incorporates a flight control computer, 2 Star Trackers, 3 axis reaction wheels and 3 axis electromagnets in a 4" x 4" x 3" (3/4U) CubeSat sized module which is compatible with the P-POD launch dispenser. The system is based on the highly successful IMI-100 miniADACS and extends its performance capability to the 0.1deg range by incorporation of 2 star cameras and attitude determination software. The system is thus responsive to the solicitation requirement of novel modification endeavors to existing COTS components. A program for development of the cameras, electronics, and processing software is outlined. The technology is significant because it extends the capability of current low cost Nanosats to tactical imaging and other missions requiring fine pointing and dynamic retargeting, missions hitherto restricted to $100M spacecraft. The new PADACS will facilitate rapid development of low cost satellites by providing a turnkey system which would be capable of determining and controlling spacecraft attitude automatically; speeding integration and simplifying operations. BENEFIT: We developed the IMI-100 miniature ADACS for CubeSats as a DARPA SBIR. This system has enabled a number of nanosatellite applications not previously possible including the NRO requirement Colony I. The performance of the IMI-100 is currently limited by the Sun sensor and magnetometer attitude determination which gives end-to-end accuracy of >1deg, limited to periods of Sun visibility. Addition of the star trackers will yield day/night accuracy of 0.1 deg which will enable many new nanosatellite applications requiring the next level of precision fine pointing such as tactical Earth imaging and Sun, planetary and deep space science. We have been very successful in commercializing the small ADACS by having sold more than 18 systems in less than one year. Improvement of system performance by an order of magnitude will open many new DoD and commercial markets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2017). Reported award amounts total $6,667,766. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.