SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wearable Inexpensive Reagentless Chemical Threat Detector

Award identifier a0448b7e2aba565d9cb041c2dfc16f0940c4160b398726546a7d20d6d1439142Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
LYNNTECH INC.
Proposal award date
2009-04-28
Contract end date
2010-01-27
UEI
PMVAL8J63516
Solicitation number
2008.3
Topic code
AF083-242

Research abstract

Rapid identification of asymmetric warfare modes, including unconventional chemical agents and toxic industrial chemicals based attacks, is vital to the protection of U.S. armed forces personnel. Existing detection methods use bulky and expensive laboratory equipment to analytically determine the identity and concentration of chemical threats, negating their battlefield use. Colorimetric indicators such as the currently deployed M8 and M9 detection papers are the fastest, cheapest, lightest and easiest type of detector to use; however, these cannot detect vapor form chemical agents, and are highly susceptible to false positives from bug spray, smoke, gasoline and strong bleach. Lynntech proposes a passive colorimetric sensor array based wearable badge capable of detecting a variety of chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals. The sensor array will consist of a combination of two sets of chemistries. One set consists of submicron engineered moieties sensitive to chemical warfare agents, while the other set comprises dipole sensitive molecules responsive to toxic industrial chemicals. These will operate on a field rugged support to colorimetrically (visual color change) signal exposure to, identity of and levels of chemical threat molecules. The sensors will be sensitive, rugged, reagentless and low cost and will meet the specifications outlined in the solicitation. BENEFIT: This development effort will lead to inexpensive and reagentless chemical threat exposure assessment visual monitors for our combatants.  The monitor badge will be versatile in that it can be worn on current personal protective equipment such as gas masks and NBC garments and provide easy visual signaling to the warfighters.  DOD components will thus protect our combatants and effectively counter potential asymmetric chemical warfare.  This technology will be commercialized for early warning of chemical threat sneak attacks against high risk locations such as at airports, government and commercial buildings for local law enforcement and security personnel.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,079 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $327,411,388. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.