SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Temperature Gaseous Nitriding of 4340 Steel for Increased Corrosion Resistance

Award identifier ddd5d2b73627ba8e54700051c50976ef8462d0f080f3d5557f07178fade10f71Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$80,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
2007-09-11
Contract end date
2008-03-11
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
2007.2
Topic code
N07-125

Research abstract

Corrosion-related maintenance of metal alloy components such as hydraulic wing and blade fold actuation systems for carrier-based aircraft and rotary gear assemblies costs the Navy approximately $1 billion per year. Innovative and low-cost surface modifications that do not compromise mechanical properties are needed to improve the corrosion resistance of the alloys. Current surface treatment technologies offer limited effectiveness in long-term use for steel alloys. These techniques include the application of hard chromium coatings, which have toxicity issues. Nitriding and/or carburizing techniques are other traditional methods used to harden steel alloy surfaces and improve corrosion resistance. One shortcoming of these methods is that the high processing temperatures required risk degrading the mechanical properties of the steel alloy. Recently investigated methods of nitriding iron at low temperatures have demonstrated that iron can be coated with a thin layer of nickel (<100 nm) and that an iron nitride layer can be formed below the nickel coating when exposed to an ammonia atmosphere at temperatures as low as 225°C. The catalytic nickel coating affects the preferential formation of the desired iron nitride compound instead of the iron oxide (i.e., corrosion). The iron nitride layer is hard, non-porous, and chemically stable at temperatures below 400°C. This process has not yet been used commercially. In this project, Ultramet will deposit a thin (<100 nm) layer of nickel on iron and 4340 steel using chemical vapor deposition technology, which does not rely on conventional thermal activation, thereby minimizing the deposition temperature. The resulting surfaces will be nitrided in an ammonia atmosphere at 325°C and lower. The viability of chemical vapor deposition for production of a hard, wear-resistant surface on these materials will be assessed, and the ability to protect them against corrosion and retain their mechanical properties will be evaluated. Chemical vapor deposition is the best alternative for protecting steel surfaces because it is the only process that can treat steel at low temperature without altering the mechanical properties of steel.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.