SBIR/STTR Research Award

Triggered-Release Biocidal Nanocomposite Coatings

Award identifier f2e774945aafd4fc3d0e794a628071e1fe33c0d5baa862a89385392ae4818b98Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$225,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2005-04-01
Contract end date
2006-06-30
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
PR-NC-04-10483
Topic code
04-NCER-P1

Research abstract

Biocidal additives are vital for both the preservation of coatings in the can and for long-term coating integrity after applications. Antifungal additives are critical for delaying attack by fungal and algal growth once an architectural coating is in place. Biocidal coatings are designed to kill microbes and fungi by slowly and steadily releasing biocide from the dried film. Unfortunately, this mechanism also is responsible for the ultimate deactivation of the biocidal activity; once the biocide has leached out or washed out of the coating, all protection against microbes is lost. The protection of the coating by the biocide typically lasts only around 18 months and even less in hot, humid environments like the South and Southeast United States. Once the biocides have leached out, a new coating must be reapplied, often after a labor-intensive washing or removal of the previous coating. This process creates a variety of undesirable environmental impacts, from the contamination of surrounding areas by nonspecific biocide leaching to the increased volatile organic compounds (VOC) emitted during the reapplication of the coating. A system that prolongs biocidal coating lifetime and decreases the environmental impacts of the current system would benefit both the environment and property owners. TDA Research, Inc., will develop a new biocidal-coating system that prolongs biocidal activity by immobilizing biocidal additives in a coating. Biocides are largely wasted because they are emitted continuously but slowly, which contaminates the surrounding area. A nonleaching biocide, however, would eliminate the undesired contamination of the surrounding area and it would stay within a coating for longer time periods. A coating that retains biocidal activity for twice as long, for example, would require repainting only half as often, also leading to a decrease in VOC emissions and waste production during painting. Such a biocide also would prevent the formation of biocide-resistant bacteria that can form from a traditional slow-release biocide.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.