SBIR/STTR Research Award

Sensitive Detection of Bacteria Contaminated Platelets

Award identifier e0f11307190db7517d6f04784ce53a7d924822f3cc1132ee309c09173fdcf862Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$128,616

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
LYNNTECH INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
PMVAL8J63516
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Bacterial contamination of platelets is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from a transfusion-transmitted infection. Bacterial contamination rates for platelets have been estimated to occur at a frequency of 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 3,000 platelet units. The risk of receiving a bacterially contaminated platelet is 50 to 250 times higher than the combined risk of transfusion-related infections from HIV, hepatitis B and C, and human T cell leukemia (HTLV I/II) viruses. There are several technical approaches for bacterial detection in platelets but none have been widely accepted. . They either detect the metabolic substrates/products, the cell's marker, or the bacteria itself. Although molecular tests based on amplification techniques allow better sensitivity, but they are far more expensive and usually require special personnel and equipment. In addition, they are subject to frequent false positive. Lynntech proposes an ultra-sensitive and fast method to detect the presence of bacterial contamination in platelets. This method can be used near the time of platelet being released for transfusion. The method uses electrochemistry to confirm the presence of bacteria. If the electrochemical result is above a threshold value, it signals the need to discard the platelet product. This technology does not require nucleic acid amplification or long incubation periods. The process will take less than 30 min to complete, and it can be fully automated to reduce contamination and labor cost. The technology is anticipated to be able to detect bacteria at a level between 102 to 103 CFU per/ml. In short, this quick and reliable testing method can be used just before a platelet concentrate is issued to a patient. This will help reduce the delay in processing and release of platelet units that are currently associated with culture based methods. Fast response time and the potential for high throughput testing will not only lower the cost of analysis but also significantly reduce the number of cases of infections and fatalities, improving the patients' quality of lives and saving the health care system millions of dollars annually.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

1,079 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $327,411,388. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.