SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: Nanoporous Silica Slurries for Enhanced Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) of Low k Dielectrics

Award identifier bf420b23ae475fa3854486776b156c5056a85beff1520cfc3e4df749ad292260Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$499,980

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Sinmat Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
EKDLPTKX33M6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research Phase II project aims to develop unique chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) slurries based on nanoporous silica particles that will meet or exceed CMP needs of low k dielectrics for the 80 nm and beyond semiconductor manufacturing nodes. The integration of low k dielectrics (dielectric constant 2.2 10 GHz CMOS expected devices in the next 3-5 years. One of the key issues plaguing the semiconductor industry is the chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) of copper/tantalum/low k dielectric materials. The low k dielectrics are fragile and are susceptible to both delamination and scratching (increased defectivity). Standard slurries employing hard abrasives may not meet the requirements for sub-80 nm CMOS devices which are expected to employ low k dielectric materials. The program proposes to develop & commercialize gentle CMP slurries based on nanoporous silica particles which exhibit reduced hardness and better stability. Combined with unique chemical formulations, these slurries are expected to achieve lower defectivity (surface scratching) and lower stress polishing than standard slurries. In this Phase II project extensive experiments will be conducted both in-house and with our partners (semiconductor chip manufacturers) to optimize performance and integration issues. Commercially this research activity has significant impact not only in the semiconductor manufacturing areas, but also in may other areas such as biotechnology and nanotechnology, which are the key areas identified by the government for the future viability of US business. First and foremost it will ensure US can maintain its lead in CMP, even though semiconductor manufacturing jobs have been migrating overseas. As CMP slurries is the largest value added application of the nanoparticle technology (> 50%) excellence in this area will provide employment to nanotechnology graduates in the near future and could be a direct application of the skills they have acquired. This research will lead to the creation of faster electronic devices, which will in turn benefit the society to become more economically productive. The development of nanoporous particle technology can have applications in several other areas including controlled drug delivery systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

42 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2016). Reported award amounts total $12,792,050. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.