SBIR/STTR Research Award

Traceability of Shrimp Utilizing Trace Elemental Analysis

Award identifier 2fe5e9fd02347cc5a8095a0c698cf0a09a58f1a34b115ed43746a91c9c7f01c8Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$79,310

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
APPLIED FOOD TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
G7TDYCLLHDN9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
8.5

Research abstract

Globalization of our seafood supply, the lack of international standards, and the numerous reported instances of fraudulent labeling of seafood products has reduced consumer confidence in seafood across the country. In addition, concerns of this rampant mislabeling of seafood products, which could lead to seafood safety issues, have prompted many to look at traceability as a means to track seafood and restore confidence in the seafood supply. "Traceability" is defined as the ability to trace the history, application, or location of a product which is under consideration. While not a new concept, identifying the origin and history of seafood products is difficult. At this time, product recall procedures and mandatory documentation are the only form of product traceability in the U.S. Shrimp has been one of the most popular and most consumed seafood items in the U.S. for many years. Currently, close to 90% of the shrimp marketed and consumed in the U.S. is imported. The primary goal of this project is the development of an analytical tool to provide shrimp traceability efforts a more science based foundation. In addition, an analytical tool to determine the geographical origins of shrimp in commerce will lend credence to mandatory Country of Labeling of shrimp and aid in the detection and prevention of transshipment of shrimp to avoid import or custom duties. Preliminary data strongly suggests that due to the inherent differences in the geology and water chemistry found in distinct marine environments, it is possible to trace a shrimp back to its origin. The unique elemental profiles of the shells and meat provide solid and significant statistical data that forms the basis of the method. This approach has been successfully applied to establish the harvest origins of salmon. It is our intent to extend and modify this approach to shrimp in order to develop a new tool that can be used for establishing the traceability of shrimp to a geographic origin. The tools and methods developed will be commercially available for use in Federal, State, public and private laboratories. This work also has potential to serve as the platform technology for developing traceability methods and protocols for other foods in commerce.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2018). Reported award amounts total $2,532,761. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.