SBIR/STTR Research Award

Direct Momentum Accommodation Coefficient Measurements for Satellite Applications

Award identifier 8850ec15be2a6729622f3e999e16bb468d55bc9477782bde35e72a9fbafa95e0Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,396

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
BUSEK CO., INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SATYSBWG3FL7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Momentum Accommodation Coefficient (MAC) measurements are required to predict the lift and drag of satellites. Typically the MACs have been inferred from tedious and costly measurements of the velocity distribution of the incident and reflected moleculesin a molecular beam facility. The reflected molecules velocity and flux must be measured in all directions. A significant burden would be removed if one could measure MACs directly, without measuring the reflected molecules properties.In Phase I, Busek Co. Inc. will demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the momentum accommodation coefficients directly by utilization of a torsion balance to measure the force applied to a surface by a well-characterized beam. In order to simulateorbital conditions, this beam must be composed of atomic oxygen with velocity of 5-8 km/s. We propose to develop a plate-neutralized-ion-beam source of atomic oxygen produced by an RF inductive discharge. This type of source can produce nearly unlimitedgas composition and a wide range of velocities, important for complete orbital simulation. Our recently developed sub-micro-Newton torsion balance will form the synergism required of this program.A complete, efficient, and widely manipulated direct force momentum accommodation coefficient measurement facility will be constructed and characterized in Phase II. Accurate MAC measurements will lead to optimization of satellite design, including one orall of the following: increased orbital life, reduced propulsion requirements and/or increased payload. The proposed effort would revolutionize the way satellite designers/builders estimate the drag of, or energy transfer to, exterior satellite surfaces.This approach does not require past flight data of satellites and their materials nor complete measuring of reflected particles, both expensive and time consuming. Any potential satellite material can be characterized for Momentum AccommodationCoefficients (MAC) in just a few days at greatly reduced costs. Busek approaches the MAC measurement facility commercialization in one, or combinations, of the following three methods including: fabricating and selling of complete facility, licensing ofthe technology and in-house testing of sample materials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

248 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $87,675,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.