SBIR/STTR Research Award

Pre-validation of Tissue Specific Micronucleus Assay for Genotoxicity Testing

Award identifier 5e539a7ed18adb5dd9e0bc1af7a4e640952c9a07ba64df1cef1174236e0dcbfbAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$207,730

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Mattek Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Q1V1JV6GJW77
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Safety assessment of any new product for human use requires genotoxicity testing to insure that the product is not carcinogenic. Current genotoxicity assays are based on bacterial or non-human cell systems. Such tests are sensitive but give very low specificity (high rate of false positive results). Hence important new chemicals (possibly life-saving drugs) may be eliminated from further development. Animal systems, e.g., rodents, are also used; however, beginning in 2009, legislation in Europe will prevent manufacturers from marketing cosmetics products that have been tested using animals. Given today's global economy, this legislation will directly affect the vast majority of US companies. Finally, for topically applied dermatologic or cosmetic materials, a test which determines genotoxicity to the skin that utilizes a system with inherent metabolic activity would be optimal. The overall goal of this proposal is to develop a skin specific genotoxicity assay. An in vitro highly differentiated skin equivalent tissue will be used to accurately determine the genotoxicity following topical exposure. Based on significant preliminary results, it is likely that this research will result in a human in vitro, skin-specific micronucleus (INVSSMN) assay which will replace current in vitro and animal-based genotoxicity tests. The INVSSMN test will overcome the low levels of specificity of current test methods and avoid animal welfare issues. The specific aims of the Phase I proposal are to: (1) evaluate the INVSSMN assay for a battery of 10 known genotoxins and 5 non-genotoxic chemicals; (2) evaluate INVSSMN assay for a battery of 10 genotoxic chemicals that are known to require metabolic activation to become mutagens; (3) investigate reproducibility of reconstructed skin genotoxicity test; and (4) automate analysis and scoring. Safety assessment of all new products for human use requires a genotoxicity testing to insure that product is not carcinogenic. Current methods are not tissue and human specific which results in extremely low level of specificity and elimination of important substances from further development. We will develop skin-specific micronucleus assay by utilizing in vitro human reconstructed skin model to overcome low levels of specificity of current test methods and avoid animal welfare issues.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

57 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2020). Reported award amounts total $21,284,028. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.