SBIR/STTR Research Award

Compact Plasma Reformer for the Ship Service Fuel Cell System

Award identifier 464f223f378cc989b99dc484bdf0d4487ca34a5433af8377c4363c92257b4191Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FSN3MKNGEDX8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCE) is developing a marine fuel cell power plant for use on naval vessels. The Ship Service Fuel Cell power generator is based on internally reformed carbonate fuel cell technology utilizing naval logistic fuels.Logistic fuels require sulfur removal and conversion to a methane-rich gas for use with the internally reforming carbonate fuel cell stacks. The present fuel processing system removes sulfur by treatment with hydrogen gas in a pressurized catalyticreactor (HDS) followed by hydrogen sulfide absorption in a zinc oxide bed. The treated fuel is converted with steam to methane-rich gas in a pre-reforming catalytic reactor. These fuel treatment reactors together with the required ancillary equipment aremajor contributors to the overall size and weight of the present power plant.In this Phase I STTR project, FCE proposes an innovative approach of using a non-catalytic plasma reformer to replace the HDS reactor, hydrogen generator, pre-reformer, and associated piping and instrumentation. This reduction in system equipmentrequirement would result in a higher power density, lower cost, and lower maintenance power plant. Success of the proposed project would be a significant milestone toward the development of compact logistic fuel processors for shipboard fuel cell electricpower generators. If this project is successful, it will significantly improve the logistic fuel processing section of the Ship Service Fuel Cell Power Plant design. The technology would eliminate key pieces of equipment; reduce the number of heat exchangers and pumps aswell as all the associated piping and instrumentation. This reduction in system complexity will result in a higher power density and lower cost power plant. The plasma reformer system in this proposal has potential advantages over conventional means of steam reforming for production of methane rich gas. The proposed plasma reformer addresses one of the critical requirements of the Ship Service Fuel Cellsystem by reducing the overall power plant size and weight, as well as reduction in power plant cost and maintenance requirement. These improvements will make the Ship Service Fuel Cell system more useful for naval as well as commercial marineapplications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

51 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2020). Reported award amounts total $13,080,296. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.