SBIR/STTR Research Award

Army Hardened Aviation Battery (AHAB)

Award identifier 478e4ab3c32460d71810233747de3d5b89d8acfff89a2d4687e0501ff1ab5c63Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$249,995

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
MACRO INDUSTRIES INC
Proposal award date
2025-02-19
Contract end date
2025-09-03
UEI
GB7HLK71NDQ4
Solicitation number
24.4
Topic code
A244-P063

Research abstract

MACRO Industries (Huntsville, AL/Lenexa/KS) will demonstrate the capability of its Macrolite High Temperature (MLHT) family of composite materials in providing a high level of advanced safety for lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) in aviation systems. While aviation platforms seem an ideal candidate for the lightweight and high-energy discharge capabilities offered by LiBs, the potentially catastrophic result of thermal runaway has limited, if not prevented, their use on most military aircraft. For this Phase I effort, MACRO will demonstrate the feasibility of the MLHT material platform for use in aircraft by developing a vendor-agnostic battery test surrogate that can contain high-energy, silicon anode (or equivalent), LiBs during thermal runaway. The surrogate, and ultimately a full battery developed in Phase II, will meet a variety of MIL-STD-810H requirements including operational temperature, altitude, temperature storage, functional shock, vibration, and gunfire vibration. In addition, the surrogate will be characterized against a variety of ballistic threats, per MIL-STD-662F.áMACROĺs approach to demonstrate feasibility will initially focus on developing next-generation (GenX) MLHT materials for use in a reduced footprint battery capable of replacing the current battery on the MH-60 Black Hawk helicopter. Ballistic testing of the MLHT materials will demonstrate that the LiBs will be protected from impacts from various threats, and concurrent testing will show that the materials can withstand the heat and debris generated induced thermal runaway. Development and testing will then turn to the enclosure to ensure it will meet the stringent environmental and air worthiness requirements (AWR) while containing the induced thermal runaway. Phase I efforts will deliver a surrogate container, demonstrating the effectiveness of the GenX MLHT. A subsequent Phase II effort will deliver a functional battery using the Army-approved chemistry, supplier, and architecture, along with the MLHT protective barrier system derived from the Phase I surrogate. MACRO will leverage relationships with existing battery and cell manufacturers to ensure that the functional battery delivered during Phase II will meet the weight, voltage, and energy requirements, while fitting inside of the enclosure developed during Phase I.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2025). Reported award amounts total $3,945,719. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.