SBIR/STTR Research Award

Validation of an In Vitro Human Airway Model

Award identifier 69fdfc86041cb9ff00b8f4c644e534390add0135dcaa480927985250acf6b459Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$199,903

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Mattek Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Q1V1JV6GJW77
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): A commercially available in vitro model of human conducting airways (EpiAirway) has been developed and utilized for a variety of basic research and industry drug delivery applications. However, the model has not been formally validated for toxicology applications in drug development and risk assessment. The goal of the present grant proposal is to validate the EpiAirway in vitro human airway model for these purposes following Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) guidelines. Experiments will be performed to determine in vitro responses of the EpiAirway model after treatment with 20 chemicals of known in vivo conducting airway toxic potentials. Test chemicals will be chosen from those with permissible exposure limits (PELs) established by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) based upon in vivo human and animal inhalation data. In vitro endpoints in the EpiAirway model will be cytotoxicity as measured by the MTT and ToxiLight cytotoxicity assays, and inflammatory cytokine/chemokine (interleukin-8, interleukin 6 and granulocyte macrophage stimulating factor) production as measured by enzyme linked immunosorbant assays. The entire set of experiments will be repeated two separate times. The data will then be statistically analyzed to determine intralaboratory reproducibility and interlaboratory transferability. The in vitro cytotoxicity and cytokine/chemokine production data will be correlated with in vivo (PELs) established for the test chemicals by OSHA. Finally, the data will be statistically evaluated to produce a prediction model for converting in vitro cytotoxicity results into a prediction of in vivo PELs. These Phase I goals constitute the prevalidation process for establishing the feasibility of proceeding to full formal validation. Milestones for advancement to Phase II are acceptable reproducibility, interlaboratory transferability of protocols and development of an acceptable prediction model. In Phase II, formal validation studies will be conducted following ICCVAM guidelines. The number and types of test compounds and formulations will be expanded and tested in blinded trials in 4 independent laboratories. The study results will then be submitted for independent assessment and regulatory acceptance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

57 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2020). Reported award amounts total $21,284,028. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.