SBIR/STTR Research Award

Autonomy Vulnerability Analysis using System Taxonomy (AVAST)

Award identifier 4b8180fca47f5f9898ee5dfbce73b5a15d1638c3c41a2170a7cd0284efb25332Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$139,793

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
Proposal award date
2024-12-05
Contract end date
2025-06-09
UEI
C12TQVKF5413
Solicitation number
24.2
Topic code
N242-078

Research abstract

The Department of Defense (DoD) is accelerating the development of autonomous vehicle sys-tems for complex air combat missions, highlighting the need to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities. SSCI proposes the Autonomy Vulnerability Analysis using System Taxonomy (AVAST) framework to address this critical requirement for the Navy. AVAST aims to develop a comprehensive ontology of vulnerabilities within autonomous systems, utilizing Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and expert insights to identify and analyze threats. This frame-work will assess risk levels, pinpoint attack vectors, and create both exploitation and mitigation strategies, providing a combinatorial view of system vulnerabilities that consider the interac-tions and dependencies between different components.In Phase I, AVAST will focus on creating a detailed model of the autonomous system, identify-ing vulnerabilities through Model-Based Vulnerability Analysis (MBVA). This includes em-ploying threat modeling, attack trees, and simulation-based security modeling. The approach will integrate digital twin and digital thread development, ensuring a thorough traceability of vulnerabilities across the system's lifecycle. Combinatorial optimization techniques will be used to discover complex attack sequences, leveraging tools like OptaPlanner to convert MBSE ob-jects into constraint satisfaction problems. The results will be documented and presented in both human-readable and computer-readable formats, facilitating comprehensive stakeholder under-standing and automated cybersecurity analysis.Looking ahead, Phase II will shift to red-team analysis, exploiting the identified vulnerabilities to understand potential attack sequences and their impact. SSCI will integrate MBSE with simu-lation tools to model these sequences accurately, employing a hypergame approach to simulate adaptive tactics and countermeasures. This phase will provide critical insights into the weak-nesses of autonomous systems, enabling the development of robust defensive strategies. The AVAST framework's systematic and innovative approach will enhance the resilience and effec-tiveness of autonomous vehicle systems in complex combat environments, ultimately strength-ening the Navy's operational capabilities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

464 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $186,567,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.