SBIR/STTR Research Award

Materials Research In Sliding Electric Contacts

Award identifier a9c57dc7544d67db68112a6b885bae9853ccf82f500310d541ea65f8f5a44548Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$595,322

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
NOESIS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
MFA1LS28VDZ9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

For more than one hundred years, painters style electrical brushes and various modifications thereof in the form of assemblies of metal wires, were universally used for sliding electrical contacts. They were replaced by monolithic graphite brushes only at the turn of the century. Monolithic graphite brushes shed Carbon particles as a result of scouring abrasion, and are transferred throughout a generator or motor by the same cooling air used to keep the current-carrying brushes cool. These particles can bridge microcircuits and/or gaps between the commutator bars, and result in the failure of electronic equipment and/or shorting across the commutator bars causing arcing in the motors/generators. Additionally, brush waste tends to embed within insulating varnishes, causing low insulation resistance and resulting in component overheating. In severe cases complete loss of power or class C fire can occur. Cleaning brush waste has been made more difficult under new environmental regulations that ban the use of chlorinated and fluorinated solvents. This limits cleaning to non-ionic soap and water, and requires a 7-10 day drying period prior to placing the component back into service. The restrictive architecture of generators and motors prevents complete removal and neutralization of cleaning solutions, necessitating more frequent cleaning. The major goals of Phase I are to establish the feasibility of (1) demonstrating performance, well above that attained by monolithic brushes, in non-laboratory settings, (2) widening material choices beyond the previously studied copper, alpha - brass, silver and gold, (3) devising strategies for relatively simple replacement of monolithic brushes by fiber brushes in existing systems, and (4) reducing the cost of state-of-the-art metal fiber brushes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2007). Reported award amounts total $7,009,764. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.